Hi,

i would like to know how many sec/ts you guys have with your systems.

I have 2.35 sec/ts with a Ahtlon XP 2600 @ 2140 MHz

I've got about 2.82 with an Athlon XP 3000 @ 2.16Ghz.

A dual Opteron 250 would be so nice right now...

For me 3.72 s/TS with a Intel Pentium 4 Mobile @ 1600 MHz.

Not the fastest Toshiba laptop ... but very reliable!

Where's everyone reading the sec/ts from?

I see on my system, bottom line of the screensaver graphic, I'm getting about 7.46 s/TS on phase 1 of 3 but that seems a bit high for my system compared to everyone else's stats so far. Currently running a dual p3-733 with only 1 WU going at the moment. (Host ID 369).
---
Jabber Status: <IMG SRC="http://www.funkymonkey.org/jabber/ed.php">
<IMG SRC="http://www.funkymonkey.org/boinc/sig.php?id=925&amp;project=pah"> <IMG SRC="http://www.funkymonkey.org/boinc/sig.php?id=169421&amp;project=sah">

&gt; Where's everyone reading the sec/ts from?
&gt;
&gt; I see on my system, bottom line of the screensaver graphic, I'm getting about
&gt; 7.46 s/TS on phase 1 of 3 but that seems a bit high for my system compared to
&gt; everyone else's stats so far. Currently running a dual p3-733 with only 1 WU
&gt; going at the moment. (Host ID 369).
&gt; ---
The lower the number is, the faster you are crunching. Your's does not seem that far out of line.

jm7

&gt; The lower the number is, the faster you are crunching. Your's does not seem
&gt; that far out of line.

Ah, low number wins. Cool. :)

Just tried the screensaver on my system, and my monitor goes to standby (off) and is unrecoverable until system is reset.

AMD FX-53
Win XP Pro SP1
Radeon x800 Pro

No BSOD, no dumps, no events, etc...

From visualisation: 1.95 s/timestep (Trickles at 5h52m intervals = 1.955 s/timestep.) machine name Emma, CP-boinc computer No.140 - AMD Athlon 2500+ XP-M - Spec' 14x133.3 for 1.87Ghz 1.45Vcore running at 13x200 for 2.6Ghz 1.8Vcore watercooled.

Hi!
I have 2.66 s./TS with a pentium 4 2.4 Ghz.

My P4 (Northwood) 1.6 GHz @ 2 Ghz has 3.39 sec/ts. The cp-bonic-client is about 20% faster than the classic cp-client was.

Time Sent (UTC) Phase Timestep CPU Time (sec) Average
06 Aug 2004 23:45:21 1 10802 25846 2.3927050546195

Athlon 64 3000+ PC2700 CL.2.5 Linux-2.6.7

My Athlon XP 1800+ @2000MHz has 4,21sec/ts. The old client was working faster on my machine

quad p4 xeon here, running 4 wu's concurrently and looks like 6.47 s/TS at cpu time of 36:41:36


Xcamel

3.05 sec/ts on a 2.4GHz HT P4 running one boinc model and classic at the same time

8.38 s/TS on an Athlon Thunderbird 1Ghz

4.34 Sec/TS on Athlon XP 2400+ (2000MHz) Linux 2.4.20-8

3.16 s/TS on a 3.06GHz P4 Dell laptop

2.42 s/TS on my AMD 64 3200+ on Windows

which is a bit slower than other AMD64's, I believe because my memory isn't so great (166 etc).

4.26 s/TS

Athlon XP 2000+ (1666 MHz) with 512 MB SDRAM, Linux 2.6.7.

2.47 s/ts

shuttle xpc sn45g with nforce2ultra400, barton 3200+, 512mb pc400 AND running legacy cpdn at the same time (cpu time sharing ^^)
<a href="http://climateapps2.oucs.ox.ac.uk/cpdnboinc/team_display.php?teamid=11">
<img src="http://www.fbs-stadtliga-cb.de/pics/wtbanner_sn45g.gif"></a>