Questions and Answers :
Windows :
Client error after abt 200 cpu hours
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 15 Nov 04 Posts: 6 Credit: 1,057,562 RAC: 0 |
I posted this to the forum earlier today, but thought I'd better send it here also. stan I almost didn't start cp back up when it went to BOINC because of problems that I had with the SETI BOINC (I have not gone back to SETI BOINC because of the problems). Anyway, when I download a new work unit it will say it will take about 2000 hours on my 1.3 Ghz machine which was acceptable as it took nearly 5 weeks on my 2.6 Ghz machine using the "classic" format. The first two work units quit after about 200 hours with a "client error" message. It uploads and gives me credit, but I wonder if it really is working or just a waste of my computer time for bad work units or bad BOINC problems. |
Send message Joined: 3 Sep 04 Posts: 5 Credit: 1,401,763 RAC: 1,369 |
I posted on General Questions that it was my experience that only about 1 in 8 of the models on boinc completed. This ratio seems to be acceptable. I too left Seti boinc (after 5 years 60,000+ classic units), I only run a token wu on a machine because of the cross user ID problem........ I have come to rather like this project as long as I dont woory about models completing, and actually because I have machines in several locations watching the stats lets me moniter those machines to see if I have a problem e.g, if a trickle dosent show up as expected. I don't use the graphics much, have had several crashes that may be due to older cards/drivers and I always suspend and then exit model before shutting down which seems to help the 1 in 8 a bit. Also I don't upgrade to the boys at seti particular version of the week. I will never return to seti, and I wish I could get away from the boinc platform, but in the mean time this is a pretty good project as long as you dont expect to see to many models to complete.... I have one model within 60 hours of completing that may not make it...its been acting funny for the last several weeks...if there is a power failure I'm sure its a goner hehe |
Send message Joined: 15 Nov 04 Posts: 6 Credit: 1,057,562 RAC: 0 |
> > I posted on General Questions that it was my experience that only about 1 in 8 > of the models on boinc completed. This ratio seems to be acceptable. > > I too left Seti boinc (after 5 years 60,000+ classic units), I only run a > token wu on a machine because of the cross user ID problem........ > > I have come to rather like this project as long as I dont woory about models > completing, and actually because I have machines in several locations watching > the stats lets me moniter those machines to see if I have a problem e.g, if a > trickle dosent show up as expected. > > I don't use the graphics much, have had several crashes that may be due to > older cards/drivers and I always suspend and then exit model before shutting > down which seems to help the 1 in 8 a bit. Also I don't upgrade to the boys at > seti particular version of the week. > > I will never return to seti, and I wish I could get away from the boinc > platform, but in the mean time this is a pretty good project as long as you > dont expect to see to many models to complete.... > > I have one model within 60 hours of completing that may not make it...its been > acting funny for the last several weeks...if there is a power failure I'm sure > its a goner hehe > > > |
Send message Joined: 15 Nov 04 Posts: 6 Credit: 1,057,562 RAC: 0 |
Answered my question. Any reason given why only 1 in 8 finish? I probably won't return to seti either and I started about a month after it got out of Beta testing. I don't think the BOINC platform is working (my opinion), but if the higher ups are ok with only 1 in 8 who am I to be concerned. I run CP on a machine that runs background programs only (24/7/365) so it's not like I'm out anything. Maybe I'll switch to Folding at Home or whatever else is out there later on, but I'll run this for a while. I run United Devices on my primary machine as a backgroung program. |
Send message Joined: 5 Aug 04 Posts: 426 Credit: 2,426,069 RAC: 0 |
The biggest reason for the 1 in 8 ratio that I see is corruption of the client_state.xml file. Everything BOINC related on a given computer is stored in this file. There has been progress made on this issue, there is now a client_state_prev.xml so sometimes a error is recoverable. Exiting BOINC manually rather than allowing the OS to kill it also helps keep this file intact. BOINC WIKI BOINCing since 2002/12/8 |
Send message Joined: 16 Oct 04 Posts: 692 Credit: 277,679 RAC: 0 |
I do not worry too much if only 1 in 8 runs completes sucessfully, when over 70% of model years calculated are in sucessfully completed models. Visit BOINC WIKI for help And join BOINC Synergy for all the news in one place. |
©2024 cpdn.org