climateprediction.net home page
AMD Athlon XP 2000+ faster as AMD Athlon 64 (Winchester) 3000+ ???

AMD Athlon XP 2000+ faster as AMD Athlon 64 (Winchester) 3000+ ???

Questions and Answers : Windows : AMD Athlon XP 2000+ faster as AMD Athlon 64 (Winchester) 3000+ ???
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
old_user2467

Send message
Joined: 28 Aug 04
Posts: 90
Credit: 2,736,552
RAC: 0
Message 7314 - Posted: 16 Jan 2005, 16:04:32 UTC

Hi!

I've bought a brand new AMD Athlon 64 3000+ Winchester cpu and replaced my old AMD Athlon XP 2000+. But I was verry surprised. The measured performance (whet & drystone) of the athlon 64 lies a lot under this of the old cpu. Also the time per timestep increased from about 3.4 to about 4.1.

I expected the athlon 64 cpu to be at least a little bit faster in processing the sh workunits. What is the problem of the new athlon 64 cpu?

Thx & Ciao, Tom


The best source for asking problems with BOINC and the ClimatePrediction client
ID: 7314 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile geophi
Volunteer moderator

Send message
Joined: 7 Aug 04
Posts: 2183
Credit: 64,822,615
RAC: 5,275
Message 7317 - Posted: 16 Jan 2005, 18:26:23 UTC

Sounds like there's something wrong with your setup. If I'm not mistaken, the 3000+ runs at 1800 MHz. My AMD64 3200+ (non-Winchester) runs at 2000 MHz. It gets about 2.20 sec/ts with RAM run at relatively slow timings. You should be getting no more than 2.6 sec/ts I would say, probably closer to 2.5. What RAM are you using, what memory speed?
ID: 7317 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
old_user147

Send message
Joined: 5 Aug 04
Posts: 30
Credit: 422,225
RAC: 0
Message 7318 - Posted: 16 Jan 2005, 18:47:21 UTC
Last modified: 16 Jan 2005, 18:47:45 UTC

My Winchester 3000+ running at 2061 MHz gets 2.13 sec/ts under linux.
Perhaps cool'n'quiet is enabled so that your cpu runs at 1000 MHz?
ID: 7318 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
old_user2467

Send message
Joined: 28 Aug 04
Posts: 90
Credit: 2,736,552
RAC: 0
Message 7325 - Posted: 16 Jan 2005, 23:37:27 UTC - in response to Message 7317.  

Probably something is wrong on my setup. I use the recently released ASUS A8N SLI DELUXE mainboard with nVidia 4 chipset. The settings in the BIOS are all turned to auto. The automatic overclocking of the ASUS BIOS is activated but the corresponding management software is not able to install, it crashes on on installation. So my system is currently not overclockt. Wheter the AMD Cool'n'quiet feature is working I don't know exactly. I installed the cool'n'quiet driver but I can't install the corresponding cool'n'quiet management software and I can't find any sign of this feature in the system overview of win xp. Isn't Win XP announcing the current CPU speed on the common tab of the system overview? This tab points out, that the AMD CPU is running with 1.81 GHz.

I'm frustrated at the moment but thanks for your posts for the moment.

Thx, Tom

The best source for asking problems with BOINC and the ClimatePrediction client
ID: 7325 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
old_user2467

Send message
Joined: 28 Aug 04
Posts: 90
Credit: 2,736,552
RAC: 0
Message 7326 - Posted: 16 Jan 2005, 23:40:33 UTC - in response to Message 7325.  

I forgot to say that Ive installed 2 x 512MB DDR400 CL 2.5 DIMMS. The vendor of this modules is of 3rd party but the memory chips are from infineon.

The best source for asking problems with BOINC and the ClimatePrediction client
ID: 7326 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
old_user2467

Send message
Joined: 28 Aug 04
Posts: 90
Credit: 2,736,552
RAC: 0
Message 7327 - Posted: 17 Jan 2005, 0:04:55 UTC - in response to Message 7318.  

> My Winchester 3000+ running at 2061 MHz gets 2.13 sec/ts under linux.
> Perhaps cool'n'quiet is enabled so that your cpu runs at 1000 MHz?
>

Ok & Thanks... The advise with the cool'n'quiet technology was a good mind. I deinstaled the cool'n'quiet driver and searched in the bios and deactivated this option there. Now the time per timestep is decreasing fast. What the resulting needed time will be at the end, Ive no idea but now boinc reached the old time per ts of my athlon xp 2000+ and it keeps falling.

Now I'm happy and thanks @josti and @geophi for your answers and advises.

Thx & Ciao, Tom

The best source for asking problems with BOINC and the ClimatePrediction client
ID: 7327 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile geophi
Volunteer moderator

Send message
Joined: 7 Aug 04
Posts: 2183
Credit: 64,822,615
RAC: 5,275
Message 7329 - Posted: 17 Jan 2005, 2:39:19 UTC - in response to Message 7327.  

> Now the time per timestep is decreasing fast.
> What the resulting needed time will be at the end, Ive no idea but now boinc
> reached the old time per ts of my athlon xp 2000+ and it keeps falling.
>
> Now I'm happy and thanks @josti and @geophi for your answers and advises.
>
> Thx & Ciao, Tom
>
You can get a sec/ts by going to the trickle page, subtracting the CPU Time (sec) of your 2nd to last trickle from the CPU Time (sec) of your last trickle, then dividing by 10802.

You can get an estimate of how long it will take to complete a model by taking the sec/ts, dividing it by 2, then multiply by 18.

2 sec/ts = 6 hrs/trickle = 18 days/model

running all the time of course.
ID: 7329 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote

Questions and Answers : Windows : AMD Athlon XP 2000+ faster as AMD Athlon 64 (Winchester) 3000+ ???

©2024 cpdn.org