Questions and Answers :
Windows :
Windows stops for a few seconds while running CP
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 1 Mar 05 Posts: 2 Credit: 2,580 RAC: 0 |
I'm running BOINC 4.19 on a Windows XP SP 2 System with an Athlon 64 3000+. When BOINC running CP, in undefined timesteps Windows hangs for a few seconds. Nothing is working in this moment, no mouse, no keyboard, nothing. After a few seconds, everything returns to normal state. This repeats at least every minute. It's very annoying, when writing something and the computer doesn't react. The second thing, I recognized, is, that I need 2.5 seconds/TS, but in the stats this processor is listed with an average of 0.45 seconds/TS... How to solve this problems? Greets MannaManna |
Send message Joined: 16 Oct 04 Posts: 692 Credit: 277,679 RAC: 0 |
Hmm. I am not aware of CP doing anything different except every 6th timestep and every 144 timesteps. 2.5 may be slightly on the slow side but 0.45 s/TS shouldn't be possible with that processor. I get about 2.1s/TS with a AMD 64 3500+. Where did you see 0.45? Was this simply the fastest rather than what is typical? Is your hard disk light flashing a lot during those few seconds? How much of your memory is used by running processes? |
Send message Joined: 1 Mar 05 Posts: 2 Credit: 2,580 RAC: 0 |
> Hmm. I am not aware of CP doing anything different except every 6th timestep > and every 144 timesteps. The radiation period is calculated at this time, isn't it? > Is your hard disk light flashing a lot during those few seconds? How much of > your memory is used by running processes? The harddisc isn't busy at this time. My machine has 512MB phsical ram, 160MB free at the moment. So no swapping problem... > 2.5 may be slightly on the slow side but 0.45 s/TS shouldn't be possible with > that processor. I get about 2.1s/TS with a AMD 64 3500+. Where did you see > 0.45? Was this simply the fastest rather than what is typical? At "Other Statistics" - "CPU Comparisons", the second entry. There is listed an AMD Athlon 64 3000+, which has 0.456 s/TS... But the MFlop and MIOp values are nearby the same, as on my machine. --> Maybe an old entry with other software? But that's not the main problem. |
Send message Joined: 7 Aug 04 Posts: 2183 Credit: 64,822,615 RAC: 5,275 |
> At "Other Statistics" - "CPU Comparisons", the second entry. There is listed > an AMD Athlon 64 3000+, which has 0.456 s/TS... But the MFlop and MIOp values > are nearby the same, as on my machine. --> Maybe an old entry with other > software? > > There appears to be major problems with that listing. The fastest one CPU PC (high end P4 - non HT) would finish a work unit in maybe around 12 days, which is ~1.3 sec/TS. Anything significantly less than that with a one CPU PC is some kind of problem in calculation. |
©2024 cpdn.org