climateprediction.net home page
Restarting from backup has discarded most of the run

Restarting from backup has discarded most of the run

Questions and Answers : Unix/Linux : Restarting from backup has discarded most of the run
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
old_user58845

Send message
Joined: 28 Feb 05
Posts: 3
Credit: 4,367
RAC: 0
Message 12753 - Posted: 21 May 2005, 8:28:59 UTC

My first model ran 27 years then I had a hardware disaster (motherboard died) which corrupted the hard disc. The last backup was the previous day, but after rebuilding, and restoring all the files I had (which includes about 800MB in dataout) it restarts at about year 3 (in 1822). Seems a shame to throw away all that work - what has gone wrong/missing?


ID: 12753 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile geophi
Volunteer moderator

Send message
Joined: 7 Aug 04
Posts: 2185
Credit: 64,822,615
RAC: 5,275
Message 12761 - Posted: 21 May 2005, 12:53:42 UTC

1822 should be year 12 of phase 1, since the model started in December 1810. So you're saying you were at year 1837 when it crashed?
ID: 12761 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
old_user58845

Send message
Joined: 28 Feb 05
Posts: 3
Credit: 4,367
RAC: 0
Message 12954 - Posted: 30 May 2005, 18:24:28 UTC - in response to Message 12761.  

> 1822 should be year 12 of phase 1, since the model started in December 1810.
> So you're saying you were at year 1837 when it crashed?
>

Sorry about the delay replying, been away. My mistake, I read 1810 as 1819. Yes it was at 1837, but now it restarts at 1822. 12 years into phase 1 instead of phase 2 - wonder if that's significant?
ID: 12954 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
old_user58845

Send message
Joined: 28 Feb 05
Posts: 3
Credit: 4,367
RAC: 0
Message 13193 - Posted: 7 Jun 2005, 9:57:15 UTC - in response to Message 12954.  

> > 1822 should be year 12 of phase 1, since the model started in December
> 1810.
> > So you're saying you were at year 1837 when it crashed?
> >
>
> Sorry about the delay replying, been away. My mistake, I read 1810 as 1819.
> Yes it was at 1837, but now it restarts at 1822. 12 years into phase 1 instead
> of phase 2 - wonder if that's significant?
>


Further to my reply a few days ago, I let it carry on from 1822. But when it completed phase 1, instead of starting phase 2 it started again right back at the beginning!

In the log file, between the two, I find:

GMTS: Error: Time variable found, but values not found (tdimlen was 0)

which is repeated 50 or so times, then it says:

GMTS: Error: Time var2005-06-06 15:49:57 [climateprediction.net] Unrecoverable error for result 2hd0_200136985_1 (process got signal 11)

then lots of downloading, creating and inflating, so I suppse that's where it gave up. Oh well...


ID: 13193 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote

Questions and Answers : Unix/Linux : Restarting from backup has discarded most of the run

©2024 cpdn.org