climateprediction.net (CPDN) home page
Thread 'Slow Athlon XP'

Thread 'Slow Athlon XP'

Questions and Answers : Wish list : Slow Athlon XP
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
old_user89925

Send message
Joined: 26 Jul 05
Posts: 2
Credit: 20,136
RAC: 0
Message 16118 - Posted: 19 Sep 2005, 5:27:55 UTC

My Athlon XP 2100+ takes around 3,6 seconds per timestep, which seems rather slow compared to my laptop (a pentium M at 1.6 GHz) that takes 2,2 seconds.

Is this normal behaviour, are there optimized clients for AMD, is there anything I can do to speed up the Athlon XP?
ID: 16118 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
old_user4125

Send message
Joined: 31 Aug 04
Posts: 1
Credit: 501,813
RAC: 0
Message 16123 - Posted: 19 Sep 2005, 13:34:40 UTC

For what it\'s worth, I\'m seeing the same thing. I believe it is due to the rather large L2 cache on the pentium-m. Athlons have 256kB (or 512kB on some models) while pentium-m have 2MB. I think this makes the difference.

Furthermore, the athlon is rated at \"2100\" which is roughly 1.7GHz. The rating is to compare with the pentium4 which while it has a high clock speed, actually does less than most CPUs per clock tick. The pentium-m is based on the pentiumpro arch and is fairly effective per clock tick.

The feeling out on the net is that pentium-m really does perform well on large number crunching applications due to the large cache.

ID: 16123 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
old_user89925

Send message
Joined: 26 Jul 05
Posts: 2
Credit: 20,136
RAC: 0
Message 16166 - Posted: 22 Sep 2005, 5:12:22 UTC - in response to Message 16123.  

For what it\'s worth, I\'m seeing the same thing. I believe it is due to the rather large L2 cache on the pentium-m. Athlons have 256kB (or 512kB on some models) while pentium-m have 2MB. I think this makes the difference.

Furthermore, the athlon is rated at \"2100\" which is roughly 1.7GHz. The rating is to compare with the pentium4 which while it has a high clock speed, actually does less than most CPUs per clock tick. The pentium-m is based on the pentiumpro arch and is fairly effective per clock tick.

The feeling out on the net is that pentium-m really does perform well on large number crunching applications due to the large cache.


So it\'s not so much a slow athlon, but my laptop is fast. Good to know, did not figure the cache was that large in a pentium-m. Thanks for the info...
ID: 16166 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bronto

Send message
Joined: 9 Aug 04
Posts: 3
Credit: 1,196,187
RAC: 0
Message 16963 - Posted: 3 Nov 2005, 8:03:33 UTC

Well, my Athlon XP 2000+ has average timestep of 5.4sec and Pentium M Dothan 1.7GHz has average timestep of 2.5sec. So your numbers are good compared to mine anyway. My models run on linux computers.
ID: 16963 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
old_user23880
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 10 Oct 04
Posts: 223
Credit: 4,664
RAC: 0
Message 16972 - Posted: 3 Nov 2005, 21:49:47 UTC

My Athlon has been doing 10 t/s per minute for two years. When cpdn started this seemed to be fairly average performance for ordinary mortals, but now people expect more. AFAIK the only way to really speed things up is O/C, but if I were you I\'d just be glad that both of the machines are stable. Sit back and let them get on with the job.

If your laptop is running for long periods, raise it slightly above the table to help keep it cool and prolong its life.
__________________________________________________

ID: 16972 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote

Questions and Answers : Wish list : Slow Athlon XP

©2024 cpdn.org