Questions and Answers : Windows : Client error or model error?
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 1 Sep 04 Posts: 161 Credit: 81,522,141 RAC: 1,164 |
Can anyone tell me what the following means? The work unit 990774, result ID 1488097, ended with an Exit Status of 0(0x0). STDERR OUT is: <core_client_version>5.2.7</core_client_version> <message><file_xfer_error> <file_name>sulphur_grm3_000782283_0_2.zip</file_name> <error_code>-161</error_code> <error_message></error_message> </file_xfer_error> <file_xfer_error> <file_name>sulphur_grm3_000782283_0_3.zip</file_name> <error_code>-161</error_code> <error_message></error_message> </file_xfer_error> <file_xfer_error> <file_name>sulphur_grm3_000782283_0_4.zip</file_name> <error_code>-161</error_code> <error_message></error_message> </file_xfer_error> <file_xfer_error> <file_name>sulphur_grm3_000782283_0_5.zip</file_name> <error_code>-161</error_code> <error_message></error_message> </file_xfer_error> </message> My result shows client error. It appears the only errors is that the model ended before all the files were created. The computation ended in about 25% of the predicted time. Is this a problem with my computer or something with the model or ?? |
Send message Joined: 5 Sep 04 Posts: 7629 Credit: 24,240,330 RAC: 0 |
This is a copy of what I posted on the Linux board: To deal with the display problem, you need to use e.g. WinWord to do a replace on the less than/greater than symbols. Use square brackets instead. The 161 error is a red herring. It just means something like \"the error files BOINC is trying to upload don\'t exist, or are empty\". The REAL error message is missing. This seems to be a recent \"problem\", and I don\'t know why it is happening, just that it is. A LOT! If you look in the file yabsd.out, which is in the dataout folder of your model, there should be an error message, or description, at the bottom of the file. THIS will tell you, (or us), what REALLY happened. The usual causes of failures are overheating, (caused by lack of air flow in the case, and/or dust on the heatsink), overclocking, (the processor just can\'t handle the intense, continuous, calcs at that speed), an agressive AV program which locks files trying to do a write, just so it can check them, (Avast, Antivir), and, I feel, a bare minimum power supply, which is letting the voltages sag under load. Hope it helps a little, if only so that you can post some more error messages. |
Send message Joined: 7 Aug 04 Posts: 2187 Credit: 64,822,615 RAC: 5,275 |
As we can see from your results page, you completed phase 1 and then it errored out. This thread talks about this and explains the bad work units. It turns out the first phase upload is valuable despite the failures. |
Send message Joined: 1 Sep 04 Posts: 161 Credit: 81,522,141 RAC: 1,164 |
This is a copy of what I posted on the Linux board: |
Send message Joined: 1 Sep 04 Posts: 161 Credit: 81,522,141 RAC: 1,164 |
Mismatch in no of prognostic fields. No of prog fields in Atmos dump 388 No of prog fields expected 389 Run RECONFIGURATION to get correct no of prognostic fields in atmos dump or Check/Reset experiment in User Interface ********************************************************************************* Model aborted with error code - 102 Routine and message:- INITDUMP: Wrong no of atmos prognostic fields ********************************************************************************* |
©2025 cpdn.org