Questions and Answers : Windows : 3000 hour WU
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 31 Aug 04 Posts: 2 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 |
I have recived a WU that require 3000 hours of work from my computer?!?! iv\'e just participate in this project so this is the first WU that i recive.... should i reset? :) /W |
Send message Joined: 5 Aug 04 Posts: 1283 Credit: 15,824,334 RAC: 0 |
Sounds about right for a 500MHz Pentium to me, Wiper <a href="http://www.teampicard.net"><img src="http://www.teampicard.net/templates/fisubice/images/phpbb2_logo.jpg"></a><a href="http://climateapps2.oucs.ox.ac.uk/cpdnboinc/team_display.php?teamid=3">Join us here</a> |
Send message Joined: 7 Aug 04 Posts: 187 Credit: 44,163 RAC: 0 |
Don't reset. The WUs for this project take a very long time to process. A couple weeks even on fast computers. <a href="http://www.boinc.dk/index.php?page=user_statistics&project=cpdn&userid=355"><img border="0" height="80" src="http://355.cpdn.sig.boinc.dk?188"></a> |
Send message Joined: 2 Sep 04 Posts: 1 Credit: 5,697 RAC: 0 |
How come the work units are not broken into smaller chunks? |
Send message Joined: 5 Aug 04 Posts: 390 Credit: 2,475,242 RAC: 0 |
> How come the work units are not broken into smaller chunks? > Hi there, since 'CPDN WUs are too large' appears several times a day, i recommend good summary there: http://www.climateprediction.net/board/viewtopic.php?t=2298 It is also noted on Getting started so should not suprice anyone http://climateapps2.oucs.ox.ac.uk/cpdnboinc/download_main.php#time And - for sure if it would be easy to slice WUs into smaller, CPDN team would have done already :-) Modelling of whole Earth climate over years is just far more complex that primitive analyzing of radio signals. |
Send message Joined: 31 Aug 04 Posts: 2 Credit: 217,153 RAC: 0 |
Ah, so the problem is that my new-this-year computer, bought for working on big Photoshop jobs, is a badly outdated slow computer. Got it. I'm seeing 1200 hours on my first workunit. In a realistic scenario (i.e. NOT assuming it runs 24hrs a day on my machine!) that's, like 200 days. |
Send message Joined: 5 Aug 04 Posts: 172 Credit: 4,023,611 RAC: 0 |
> Ah, so the problem is that my new-this-year computer, bought for working on > big Photoshop jobs, is a badly outdated slow computer. Got it. I'm seeing > 1200 hours on my first workunit. In a realistic scenario (i.e. NOT assuming > it runs 24hrs a day on my machine!) that's, like 200 days. > One of the computers that I attached with (to see what if it would get work, I wasn't expecting any) was scheduled to take 16000 hours (yes, I have the right number of 0's there). The model eventually crashed (sort of expected but interesting), and the computer has been removed from service as I have a less old, and less slow replacement. <a href="http://www.boinc.dk/index.php?page=user_statistics&project=cpdn&userid=13"><img border="0" height="80" src="http://13.cpdn.sig.boinc.dk?188"></a> |
©2025 cpdn.org