climateprediction.net (CPDN) home page
Thread 'BOINC V 5.2.13 reports lower benchmark (-36%)'

Thread 'BOINC V 5.2.13 reports lower benchmark (-36%)'

Questions and Answers : Windows : BOINC V 5.2.13 reports lower benchmark (-36%)
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
old_user81910

Send message
Joined: 12 Jun 05
Posts: 2
Credit: 366,094
RAC: 0
Message 22899 - Posted: 25 May 2006, 8:08:59 UTC

I recently upgraded to version 5.2.13 from version 4.19. The CPU bencmark figures have changed significantly: reduction in Dhrystone result of approx 36%.

PC is P4-3.6GHz, Multithreading using WinXP-SP2. 2Gbyte RAM, disks are 150M-SATA. Hardware configuration unchanged since I began running CPDN last year.

Under V4.19 typical result was:
\"2006-05-01 02:09:49 [---] Benchmark results:
Number of CPUs: 2
1533 double precision MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
2840 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU\"

Under 5.2.13 typical result is:

\"2006-05-06 02:59:15 [---] Benchmark results:
Number of CPUs: 2
1531 double precision MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
1819 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU\"

I retested my PC using \"Passmark Performance test\" which reported very similar results to when PC was new (before XP-SP2 \"upgrade\") so I suspect that the PC is performing the same as before, but the Dhrystone results reported are different for some reason.
Is this a problem with 5.2.13? (Re-Installed as \"single user\" - no different to installing as \"server\").

Simon


ID: 22899 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Les Bayliss
Volunteer moderator

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 04
Posts: 7629
Credit: 24,240,330
RAC: 0
Message 22902 - Posted: 25 May 2006, 10:18:03 UTC

The 5.* versions use a different algorithm to work out benchmarks than earlier versions. And they\'re still useless for this project, and still not used.
I went from version 4.05 to 4.25, so I don\'t know what they would have been like with 4.19; however, with 5.2.8, my integer has jumped a fair bit:

Benchmark results: (4.25)
1428 double precision MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
1230 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU

Benchmark results: (5.2.8)
1719 double precision MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
3538 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
ID: 22902 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileKeck_Komputers
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 5 Aug 04
Posts: 426
Credit: 2,426,069
RAC: 0
Message 22903 - Posted: 25 May 2006, 10:37:35 UTC - in response to Message 22902.  

The 5.* versions use a different algorithm to work out benchmarks than earlier versions. And they\'re still useless for this project, and still not used.
I went from version 4.05 to 4.25, so I don\'t know what they would have been like with 4.19; however, with 5.2.8, my integer has jumped a fair bit:

Benchmark results: (4.25)
1428 double precision MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
1230 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU

Benchmark results: (5.2.8)
1719 double precision MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
3538 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU

Also the benchmarks in the windows version of 4.19 were badly bugged, the compiler \"optimized\" most of the code out since it did not have any output.
BOINC WIKI

BOINCing since 2002/12/8
ID: 22903 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
old_user81910

Send message
Joined: 12 Jun 05
Posts: 2
Credit: 366,094
RAC: 0
Message 22920 - Posted: 26 May 2006, 15:14:52 UTC - in response to Message 22903.  

Thanks Les and John for the quick replies.

I guess that my machine is indeed running OK and as you suggest the BOINC benchmarks are a bit misleading.

Simon
ID: 22920 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote

Questions and Answers : Windows : BOINC V 5.2.13 reports lower benchmark (-36%)

©2025 cpdn.org