hello,

BOINC - Tâches
=> 0H - 0% => in 1446 hours (2 months)
=> 6H - 0.37% => in 1443 hours

http://climateapps2.oucs.ox.ac.uk/cpdnboinc/result.php?resultid=12018154

2.90 sec/TS

TimeStep 7575 / 2073960

:)

---

hadcm3igeo_w15e_2000_80_06746675_1

825 hours
2.06 s/TS

---

Backups: Here

Got 4 of them and all are running well after about 20h :)

No graphic showing though after first trickle

1.80-1.89 s/TS on Linux, much faster than the last batch on the Beta site

I just downloaded 2 of the new 80 year CM models to my 2.2 GHz machine with 4 GB of RAM and was astonished to see the “to completion” time at 5069 hours. I am hoping that this is a major over estimation. What gives? Why so high an estimate?

I remember running the old 160 year CM’s on a 1.5 GHz machine that had only 1 GB of RAM and it took only about 3500 hours to complete them. Good thing that I didn’t download them to my slower machine as I would like to finish them before the sun burns out. ;-)

---

There's an older thread here that talks about the length of these models.

As to why you have an estimate of over 5,000 hours, that may depend on what other work BOINC has in it's To Do list, and also this project's resource share.

---

Backups: Here

Trickle 1 = 326.59 Credit

326.59 x 80 = 26127.2 credit

:)

---

Trickle 1 = 326.59 Credit

326.59 x 80 = 26127.2 credit


26.127 credits should be about tight of this type of model. If I remember correctly, the old 160 year CM’s produced about 44,000 credits for a finished model.

[/quote]

---

My four models haves past the first decade and uploaded the 15Mb 1.zip

I thought they would show some graph like in the former hadcm variants I ran, no?

1.80-1.89 s/TS on Linux, much faster than the last batch on the Beta site

Thanks for that note cwhyl. The applications build date suggests it was compiled back in 2008, and I would swear that that version was slow on Linux. Perhaps a rebuild that isn't advertised on the applications page?

I didn't rebuild the application before generating the most recent workunits, as it's for the same sort of experiment that was previously done with that model and we're a bit short-staffed at the moment.

1.80-1.89 s/TS on Linux, much faster than the last batch on the Beta site

Thanks for that note cwhyl. The applications build date suggests it was compiled back in 2008, and I would swear that that version was slow on Linux. Perhaps a rebuild that isn't advertised on the applications page?

Ah, I compared to the latest highly optimised 6.05/Beta batch that was 2.7!! times slower than Jims' Q9550/2.8 GHz Win7

My boxen is Q6600 at 3.2-3.4 GHz

I don't remember the speed of the latest hadcm I ran here some years ago and the record seem to have been wiped out :-(

Here I've seen 1.11 and 1.50 s/Ts on newer windows i-series machines

... the record seem to have been wiped out ...

Not 'wiped out', archived.

This is mentioned on people's Account pages, not far from the top.

... the record seem to have been wiped out ...

Not 'wiped out', archived.

This is mentioned on people's Account pages, not far from the top.

oh,I understand that Les..

"26.127 credits should be about tight of this type of model. If I remember correctly, the old 160 year CM’s produced about 44,000 credits for a finished model."

44,000 perhaps should be the amount, as I am noticing so far a drop of up to 20-40% from FAMOUS. The models, every 24 timestep hours, revert back and redo the same timestep albeit at a much faster speed. They will likely go over 1000 hours to complete on my M/C.

---

The models, every 24 timestep hours, revert back and redo the same timestep albeit at a much faster speed.

Not quite.
For the Coupled Ocean models, there are two different phases in the calcs: the "slow" 24 hours is the Atmospheric phase. The "fast" 24 hours is the Ocean phase. It's faster because the conditions deep in the ocean change very slowly.

The FAMOUS models use a different strategy. This can be read about here on the relevant page of the Experiments section near the front of the project's web site.

---

Backups: Here

Why the heck is there no graphic showing on these models?

w1aj-2000-80_1.zip 15.70 MB

15.70 MB x 8 = 125.6 MB

:)

---

Thanks Les. It is an interesting behavior for the model though the Ocean Phase is as fast as the dip in my RAC. Oh well.
:)

---

Why the heck is there no graphic showing on these models?

They'll be along later. There hasn't been time to write the graphs program yet.

---

Backups: Here

I'm going to second Darmok about the dip in RAC.
Is any adjustment possible?
It's an old story, but if a 1000+ hours model is useful, is there a way to encourage crunchers? ;-)
Jim, did you mean "right"? Although "tight" may be to the point :-)

Still, they're going along nicely.

---

Forum search Site search