Message boards : Number crunching : BOINC CPDN Performance
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 30 Aug 04 Posts: 1 Credit: 593,222 RAC: 0 |
I have some strange performance issues. Before BOINC my 5 pc rank was: 1: AMD Athlon 3200+ Windows XP 2: Intel P4 3.0 Windows XP 3: Intel P4 2.4 Windows 2000 4: AMD Athlon 1800+ Windows XP 5: Intel P4 1.8 Windows 2003 Server Now I have the following 1: Intel P4 2.4 Windows 2000 2: Intel P4 3.0 Windows XP 3: AMD Athlon 3200+ Windows XP 4: Intel P4 1.8 Windows 2003 Server 5: AMD Athlon 1800+ Windows XP While my nr one computer, is the one I use the most This is very strange to me Marc |
Send message Joined: 5 Aug 04 Posts: 426 Credit: 2,426,069 RAC: 0 |
It has been posted in other threads that the intel chips run the BOINC version of CPDN a bit faster than the classic version. It has also been stated that the AMD chips run it a bit slower. If you had hyperthreading enabled it would most likely make it even more noticable that the intels are doing better. Why the 2.4 is ahead of the 3.0 I don't know. <br>John Keck -- BOINCing since 2002/12/08 -- <a href="http://www.boinc.dk/index.php?page=user_statistics&project=cpdn&userid=191"><img border="0" height="80" src="http://191.cpdn.sig.boinc.dk?188"></a> |
Send message Joined: 19 Aug 04 Posts: 39 Credit: 18,866 RAC: 0 |
Its not about the type of CPU I think. I have also noticed that if the computer (I have only one) is in use, it takes to it 7 hrs (external clock) to complete a trickle. When the computer is not in use, the time raises to 9-10 hrs. But when I check "Run always" instead of "Run based on preferences" everything falls into place. <img src="http://boinc.mundayweb.com/cpdn/stats.php?userID=70"> |
©2024 cpdn.org