Questions and Answers :
Windows :
Task status 'Didn't need'
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 20 Nov 18 Posts: 20 Credit: 816,342 RAC: 1,139 |
Hello, I just finished long wah2 task. Credit has been applied but status of the finished task shows as 'Didn't need' and 'Run time' and 'CPU time' shows 0. https://www.cpdn.org/cpdnboinc/result.php?resultid=21449810 |
Send message Joined: 15 May 09 Posts: 4529 Credit: 18,661,594 RAC: 14,529 |
I just finished long wah2 task. Credit has been applied but status of the finished task shows as 'Didn't need' and 'Run time' and 'CPU time' shows 0. There was a bug in the code for this batch which led to nearly all of them failing at the very end even though they appeared to finish. This led to the batch of work being withdrawn. I thought Andy or one of the other project people had arranged for the project servers to send the kill signal to the computers running them so they could be terminated and allow more work to reach the computers. Clearly if sent, that kill signal didn't reach all the computers running the tasks or if it did, it didn't work! Edit: If you step through the task pages for others in the batch by increasing the last digit of the url by one at a time, you will see several others have that status. |
Send message Joined: 7 Aug 04 Posts: 2183 Credit: 64,822,615 RAC: 5,275 |
I think that kill signal only works when the PC running one of those tasks communicates with the server. Since there was quite a period of time between trickles on that PC, it probably was the first contact with cpdn after the decision was made to withdraw the batch. |
Send message Joined: 15 May 09 Posts: 4529 Credit: 18,661,594 RAC: 14,529 |
Since there was quite a period of time between trickles on that PC, it probably was the first contact with cpdn after the decision was made to withdraw the batch. As usual you are right, a more careful look at the task and I would have seen the clue. |
Send message Joined: 4 Jan 19 Posts: 2 Credit: 234,492 RAC: 0 |
I had/have 2 of these. One completed of feb 6. https://www.cpdn.org/cpdnboinc/result.php?resultid=21469541 But the other is still running https://www.cpdn.org/cpdnboinc/result.php?resultid=21469551 Last Trickle was on feb 12. He is now at 80% Should I abort this one? I just started with calculating for CPDN. But so far is seems to be a waste of computer time as 2 of the 3 runs have been for nothing :-( But I hope this due to all the problems lately. I will give it the benfit of the doubt |
Send message Joined: 5 Sep 04 Posts: 7629 Credit: 24,240,330 RAC: 0 |
Yes, please abort all batch 781 models. That batch was closed on 22nd January. It was talked about somewhere in Number crunching at the time. But so far is seems to be a waste of computer time as 2 of the 3 runs have been for nothing That, unfortunately, is part of this "leading edge" research. While we haven't had a "project kill" in over a decade, things do go wrong, which is why this isn't a "set and forget" project. No work at the moment either, which is another problem here, with so few models, and so many computers waiting to pounce. |
Send message Joined: 20 Nov 18 Posts: 20 Credit: 816,342 RAC: 1,139 |
Thank you for the update. |
Send message Joined: 4 Jan 19 Posts: 2 Credit: 234,492 RAC: 0 |
Thanks for the quick reply. I aborted this model and await the next one ;-) |
©2024 cpdn.org