No, (A.M.D. Athlon 2100+ win98)
No, (A.M.D. Athlon 64 3000+ win98)
No, (Intel Celeron D 320 win98)
Yes ,no SETI or LHC on this machine only.(A.M.D. Sempron 3300+ win98)

<img src="http://www.setisynergy.com/images/stats/3638cpdn.png">

---

&gt; No, (A.M.D. Athlon 2100+ win98)
&gt; No, (A.M.D. Athlon 64 3000+ win98)

The Win 98/AMD combination was said to be pretty flakey in the classic version as well.

&gt; No, (Intel Celeron D 320 win98)

A few people have managed to complete a run with processors well below the 800 MHz recommended minimum spec. But they are very much the exception.

&gt; Yes ,no SETI or LHC on this machine only.(A.M.D. Sempron 3300+ win98)

At least the Win 98/AMD combination isn't fatal for CPDN!

---

&gt; &gt; No, (Intel Celeron D 320 win98)
&gt;
&gt; A few people have managed to complete a run with processors well below the 800
&gt; MHz recommended minimum spec. But they are very much the exception.
&gt;
&gt;
Hi Andrew. I think that the 320 runs at 2.4 GHz. It's the new Intel model numbering scheme.

AMD XP 2500+ spec' 11x167 for 1.83GHz running at 12.5x180 for 2.25GHz watercooled, <a href="http://climateapps2.oucs.ox.ac.uk/cpdnboinc/show_host_detail.php?hostid=65740">'Marion'</a>, is running CP-boinc under WinME - she has completed two models and is 10% through her 3rd model running CP-boinc. BOINC v4.13 plus CP v4.04 works for her... :-)

---

<a href="http://www.nmvs.dsl.pipex.com/"><img src="http://boinc.mundayweb.com/cpdn/stats.php?userID=6&amp;team=off&amp;trans=off"></a>

<a href="http://www.nmvs.dsl.pipex.com/">Distributed Mania</a>

&gt; Hi Andrew. I think that the 320 runs at 2.4 GHz. It's the new Intel model
&gt; numbering scheme.

Thanks. Should have checked. Intel periodically invite me to visit their website but I'm afraid I'm usually seduced by the latest top of the range models which I can't afford and can't justify getting.

---