Look <a href="http://climateapps2.oucs.ox.ac.uk/cpdnboinc/workunit.php?wuid=483061">here</a>.

I've finished this wu but it only shows that I sent 67 trickles when it should be 70. It is cleared from the work tab and I have a new wu to crunch on. Any thoughts?

---

&gt; I've finished this wu but it only shows that I sent 67 trickles when it should
&gt; be 70. It is cleared from the work tab and I have a new wu to crunch on. Any
&gt; thoughts?
&gt;
It shows you have the full credits for that run (even though trickles are missing), and your all phase results graphs are there, so that is good. The only thing seems to be that is that the status under the result page you have

In Progress Unknown New

instead of

Over Success Done

I've had a couple runs like that lately. Carl (former IT guy here) said that these are still used on the science end.

If you're prepared to do some calculating, and some editing, you can create 5 trickle files to replace the ones that got lost. That may fix the messages.
You'll need to work out which time steps are missing, and start saving a copy of trickles, so that 1), you can study the pattern they follow, and 2), you have something to edit.
The idea is simple, but doing it is a bit tricky, especially the long file name. I'm not sure how critical this is.
I created two, for two current models, and when they finally showed up, they fitted nicely into their correct positions. I haven't finished the models yet, so I'm only guessing about the outcome of the messages.

You CAN'T do this with 'end-of-phase' trickles, as these have extra data for the graphs, but in this case, you have all these.

As geophi said, the science is all there, and credits are created by examining the latest trickle data. It's just some of the info created and displayed for the benefit of the user that's missing.

Still interested?

Les