sulphur_a70m_000475654_0 is still crunching despite having experienced a \"snowball earth\" problem during stage 3. Up until the plunge down in temperature and preciptation it was acting normally and continued to act normally after the dip for the remainder of stage three. Should I cancel this workunit our are the remainder of it\'s results scientifically important still? It is a workunit marked as Over in the status page currently for what I can only assume is the same reason as was adressed in another thread.

The odditiy is possibly a loss of data at that point.
I\'d suggest that you continue. The rest of the data will be useful.
From the point of view of statistics, i\'ts important not to pre-judge what the researcher\'s consider useful data.

(One of my slab models had a spike in the opposite direction, and others have had similar.)

Thanks, I will let this complete normally.

---

Goody. We have models predicting the next Ice Age as well as when the whole place goes up in flames. So comforting.

---

Lots of discussions on ice-ball earths <a href=\"http://www.climateprediction.net/board/viewforum.php?f=8\"> here,</a> especially way over the page, near the start. Or look at \"Frozen Panama & Equador again...\".
Most of the graphs and charts are probably gone by now.

Shame about the super volcano eruption next month. :)