climateprediction.net (CPDN) home page
Thread 'Claimed versus Granted Cobblestones'

Thread 'Claimed versus Granted Cobblestones'

Message boards : Number crunching : Claimed versus Granted Cobblestones
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
ProfileConan
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 6 Jul 06
Posts: 147
Credit: 3,615,496
RAC: 420
Message 29266 - Posted: 16 Jun 2007, 12:25:08 UTC
Last modified: 16 Jun 2007, 12:31:53 UTC

Have just finished my 2nd ever complete Work Unit but there seems to be a difference to the way credit claims have been done.
When my first 5.15 WU completed in April the claimed and granted cobblestones were the same.
Now I have completed my 2nd 5.15 WU the claimed and granted are totally different.
Also on my first completed WU the time difference from the last trickle to the final time total was very small (about a thousand seconds). On my 2nd completed WU the time difference from the last trickle to the final time total was close to another trickle in time (20,000 odd seconds), is this significant?
Seeing that the second WU took longer than the first I would of thought I would of got more credit for it but instead I got less.
Can anyone tell me why my claimed has been so low?

1st completed WU

2nd completed WU

Also even though both WU\'s completed ok they both have the same error message on the result

(null): cannot open input file dataout/atmos_restart.day
(null): cannot open input file dataout/ocean_restart.day


ID: 29266 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileStrathpeffer
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Jan 07
Posts: 497
Credit: 342,899
RAC: 0
Message 29267 - Posted: 16 Jun 2007, 13:54:29 UTC

All completed models should get 41,472 credit, Conan, doesn\'t matter how long they take. I can\'t explain the difference between \"claimed credit\" and \"granted credit\" but it looks like your second model didn\'t quite complete - though definitely close enough to be considered as completed by the project. Its last-reported timestep on 15 June is showing as 4,095,360, where it should be 4,147,200. And the heading on the graph is showing 1921-2079, where it should show 1921-2081. Depending on how much of a purist you are (!), if you have a very recent backup, you could try running the last bit again to see if it gets past whatever the last-minute problem was. And, if you look in the stdoutdae file in your BOINC folder, you might find an explanation.

MM @ the Pavilion
Visit the Scotland team
ID: 29267 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileConan
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 6 Jul 06
Posts: 147
Credit: 3,615,496
RAC: 420
Message 29269 - Posted: 17 Jun 2007, 1:28:23 UTC

Whilst the graph is showing it finished in 2079 it actually went to completion in 1/12/2080


hadcm3ohc_1na3_05625186 - PH 1 TS 4146769 A - 25/11/2080 00:30 - H:M:S=2193:49:20 AVG= 1.90 DLT= 1.00

hadcm3ohc_1na3_05625186 - PH 1 TS 4147201 A - 01/12/2080 00:30 - H:M:S=2194:02:40 AVG= 1.90 DLT= 0.78
file dataout/1na3fo.pjs0c10 is a 32 bit ieee um file
file dataout/1na3fo.pis0c10 is a 32 bit ieee um file
file dataout/1na3fo.pfs0c10 is a 32 bit ieee um file
file dataout/1na3fo.pcs0c10 is a 32 bit ieee um file
stash/field code 30320 is unknown to LATS lookup table and is not written to output netcdf file. You need to define the field via an external LATS parameter file and PP codes -> LATS conversion table using the -l and -p options.
file dataout/1na3fo.pbs0c10 is a 32 bit ieee um file
file dataout/1na3fa.phs0c10 is a 32 bit ieee um file
file dataout/1na3fa.pgs0c10 is a 32 bit ieee um file
file dataout/1na3fa.pes0c10 is a 32 bit ieee um file
file dataout/1na3fa.pds0c10 is a 32 bit ieee um file
Trickling yearly means for 2080
Building file list for 2080 in dataout -- 9 entries
adding: hadcm3ohc_1na3_05625186_0_meana_2080_pd.nc (deflated 83%)
adding: hadcm3ohc_1na3_05625186_0_meana_2080_pg.nc (deflated 83%)
adding: hadcm3ohc_1na3_05625186_0_meano_2080_opt.nc (deflated 80%)
adding: hadcm3ohc_1na3_05625186_0_meano_2080_pi.nc (deflated 86%)
adding: hadcm3ohc_1na3_05625186_0_meano_2080_pj.nc (deflated 81%)
Creating trickle file trickle_hadcm3ohc_1na3_05625186_0_2080.zip for upload...
Processing decadal means for 2071 through 2080
adding: hadcm3ohc_1na3_05625186_0_10ya_2070s_ph.nc (deflated 11%)
adding: hadcm3ohc_1na3_05625186_0_10ya_2070s_pf.nc (deflated 57%)
adding: hadcm3ohc_1na3_05625186_0_10ya_2070s_pe.nc2007-06-16 18:48:47 [climateprediction.net] Sending scheduler request: To send trickle-up message
2007-06-16 18:48:47 [climateprediction.net] (not requesting new work or reporting completed tasks)
(deflated 29%)
adding: 1na3fo.pcs0c10.nc (deflated 52%)
adding: 1na3fo.pbs0c10.nc (deflated 60%)
adding: ocean_restart.day (deflated 62%)
adding: shmem_restart.day (deflated 0%)
adding: climate.cpdc (deflated 75%)
adding: yafbg.stashc (deflated 90%)
2007-06-16 18:48:52 [climateprediction.net] [file_xfer] Started upload of file hadcm3ohc_1na3_05625186_0_16.zip
2007-06-16 18:48:57 [climateprediction.net] Scheduler RPC succeeded [server version 509]

2007-06-16 18:54:11 [climateprediction.net] [file_xfer] Finished upload of file hadcm3ohc_1na3_05625186_0_16.zip
2007-06-16 18:54:11 [climateprediction.net] [file_xfer] Throughput 27246 bytes/sec
Queuing intermediate upload for CPDN/BOINC: cpdnout16.zip
Phase over, going into post_processing()
Post-processing successful!
Finished a complete run, now you can upload!
Cleaning up graphics data...
Detaching shared memory...
2007-06-16 18:55:10 [climateprediction.net] Computation for task hadcm3ohc_1na3_05625186_0 finished


2007-06-16 21:06:03 [climateprediction.net] Sending scheduler request: Requested by user
2007-06-16 21:06:03 [climateprediction.net] Reporting 1 tasks
2007-06-16 21:06:13 [climateprediction.net] Scheduler RPC succeeded [server version 509]

As you can see it says I completed a complete run right till 1/12/2080 with no errors.

So why have I lost credit for this WU?
It seems from the readout that the last trickles have not been credited perhaps?
ID: 29269 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Les Bayliss
Volunteer moderator

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 04
Posts: 7629
Credit: 24,240,330
RAC: 0
Message 29270 - Posted: 17 Jun 2007, 4:25:53 UTC


Credit is a fickle thing. It can sometimes take a while if the program stops for some reason.
It\'s more like \"climate\" than \"weather\". But it\'ll show up sooner or later.
(A bit like death and taxs.)

ID: 29270 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileConan
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 6 Jul 06
Posts: 147
Credit: 3,615,496
RAC: 420
Message 29272 - Posted: 17 Jun 2007, 11:29:53 UTC - in response to Message 29270.  


Credit is a fickle thing. It can sometimes take a while if the program stops for some reason.
It\'s more like \"climate\" than \"weather\". But it\'ll show up sooner or later.
(A bit like death and taxs.)



Thanks Les but it is good news. The last two trickles that I had a guess were missing have now been added and credited.
I now have my 2nd completed CPDN WU and a hapy guy am I. TWo more to go.
ID: 29272 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profilemo.v
Volunteer moderator
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Sep 04
Posts: 2363
Credit: 14,611,758
RAC: 0
Message 29290 - Posted: 26 Jun 2007, 14:04:19 UTC

Belated congratulations from me!
Cpdn news
ID: 29290 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote

Message boards : Number crunching : Claimed versus Granted Cobblestones

©2024 cpdn.org