Message boards : Number crunching : Hyperthreading
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 13 Sep 04 Posts: 60 Credit: 1,124,063 RAC: 0 |
So, the question is, assuming RAM isn\'t a problem, does crunching go quicker (in the total throughput sense) with two models per CPU or with one, when running on a NetBurst architecture chip? |
Send message Joined: 7 Aug 04 Posts: 2187 Credit: 64,822,615 RAC: 5,275 |
Running two models with hyperthreading increases throughput by about 15% on a single processor P4. On dual Xeons with hyperthreading, there doesn\'t appear to be any advantage due to front side bus/memory access/contention problems. |
Send message Joined: 13 Sep 04 Posts: 60 Credit: 1,124,063 RAC: 0 |
Thanks for the info. Maybe once my 4 models are out of the way I\'ll get two more models, not four, especially as I\'m thinking of trying the attribution project and four models would be somewhat heavy! |
Send message Joined: 4 Sep 06 Posts: 79 Credit: 5,583,517 RAC: 0 |
Running two models with hyperthreading increases throughput by about 15% on a single processor P4. On dual Xeons with hyperthreading, there doesn\'t appear to be any advantage due to front side bus/memory access/contention problems. Does this mean that I can run 8 models on my Q6600? I have 4 GB 800MHz ram |
Send message Joined: 13 Jan 06 Posts: 1498 Credit: 15,613,038 RAC: 0 |
The Core processors don\'t have hyperthreads (it\'s only the old Pentium 4 \'netburst\' range which did). I'm a volunteer and my views are my own. News and Announcements and FAQ |
©2024 cpdn.org