Thread 'Aborted a crawler.'

Author	Message
adrianxw Send message Joined: 31 Aug 04 Posts: 145 Credit: 2,080,724 RAC: 753	Message 33875 - Posted: 19 May 2008, 15:52:25 UTC This wu after 32 hours had crawled to 1.6% complete. Obviously one of the crawlers, so I\'ve aborted it. Wave upon wave of demented avengers march cheerfully out of obscurity into the dream. ID: 33875 · Reply Quote

Iain Inglis Send message Joined: 9 Jan 07 Posts: 467 Credit: 14,549,176 RAC: 317	Message 33879 - Posted: 19 May 2008, 16:41:08 UTC Blimey! That didn\'t get very far before hitting the treacle. Your Intel oppo on that WU did the same ... ID: 33879 · Reply Quote

mo.v Volunteer moderator Send message Joined: 29 Sep 04 Posts: 2363 Credit: 14,611,758 RAC: 0	Message 33882 - Posted: 19 May 2008, 17:46:56 UTC This is strange. Darknightcl has continued his task from the same workunit, and his is getting faster and faster which isn\'t usually a good sign (though there may be benign reasons). It will be interesting to see his graphs when he\'s finished Phase 1. Will they be normal or not? http://climateapps2.oucs.ox.ac.uk/cpdnboinc/result.php?resultid=7414653 Cpdn news ID: 33882 · Reply Quote

Thyme Lawn Volunteer moderator Send message Joined: 5 Aug 04 Posts: 1283 Credit: 15,824,334 RAC: 0	Message 33885 - Posted: 19 May 2008, 20:24:19 UTC Interesting. Darknightcl\'s model is running on an AMD Phenom system. Adrianxw\'s and mig77\'s aborted models were both on Intel Core2 systems. "The ultimate test of a moral society is the kind of world that it leaves to its children." - Dietrich Bonhoeffer ID: 33885 · Reply Quote

geophi Volunteer moderator Send message Joined: 7 Aug 04 Posts: 2187 Credit: 64,822,615 RAC: 5,275	Message 33888 - Posted: 19 May 2008, 21:34:20 UTC Given the speed Darknight\'s run started out at, it must have been started on another computer and moved to this one, or started on a slower processor, that was upgraded. ID: 33888 · Reply Quote

mo.v Volunteer moderator Send message Joined: 29 Sep 04 Posts: 2363 Credit: 14,611,758 RAC: 0	Message 33891 - Posted: 20 May 2008, 2:18:29 UTC Either that or else part of the data isn\'t being processed which is what I\'d bet on. Cpdn news ID: 33891 · Reply Quote

mo.v Volunteer moderator Send message Joined: 29 Sep 04 Posts: 2363 Credit: 14,611,758 RAC: 0	Message 33895 - Posted: 21 May 2008, 6:49:18 UTC Darknight\'s Phase 1 graphs are perfectly normal so my suspicion was unfounded. The model seems to be doing very well on an AMD: http://climateapps2.oucs.ox.ac.uk/cpdnboinc/result.php?resultid=7414653 Cpdn news ID: 33895 · Reply Quote