Questions and Answers : Macintosh : Mac OS X vs XP? Or Merom vs Conroe?
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 13 Sep 04 Posts: 60 Credit: 1,124,063 RAC: 0 |
Here\'s the deal. I have a OS X iMac running a T7600 Merom Core 2 Duo at 2.33GHz, FSB 667MHz, cache 4MB, RAM 3GB. Average work unit speed for 160 year model is 1.27 secs / TS. Also I have a Win XP Pro SP2 machine, E6750 Conroe at 2.66GHz, FSB 1.33GHz, cache 4MB, RAM 2GB. Average speed 1.82 secs / TS. What gives? I\'m getting nearly 50% more speed from the notebook chipset than the desktop one? Neither machine is stressed with respect to RAM usage. Strange. |
Send message Joined: 5 Sep 04 Posts: 7629 Credit: 24,240,330 RAC: 0 |
This was noted during testing of the Mac models. (On the beta test site.) The new Intel Macs run the models a lot faster than Windows / Linux machines. Something to do with the design of the Mac. But the Macs have a very limited stack space, which can cause crashes. You win some, you lose some. :) |
©2024 cpdn.org