climateprediction.net (CPDN) home page
Thread 'Mac OS X vs XP? Or Merom vs Conroe?'

Thread 'Mac OS X vs XP? Or Merom vs Conroe?'

Questions and Answers : Macintosh : Mac OS X vs XP? Or Merom vs Conroe?
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
old_user17401

Send message
Joined: 13 Sep 04
Posts: 60
Credit: 1,124,063
RAC: 0
Message 34058 - Posted: 12 Jun 2008, 19:34:37 UTC

Here\'s the deal.

I have a OS X iMac running a T7600 Merom Core 2 Duo at 2.33GHz, FSB 667MHz, cache 4MB, RAM 3GB. Average work unit speed for 160 year model is 1.27 secs / TS.

Also I have a Win XP Pro SP2 machine, E6750 Conroe at 2.66GHz, FSB 1.33GHz, cache 4MB, RAM 2GB. Average speed 1.82 secs / TS.

What gives? I\'m getting nearly 50% more speed from the notebook chipset than the desktop one? Neither machine is stressed with respect to RAM usage. Strange.
ID: 34058 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Les Bayliss
Volunteer moderator

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 04
Posts: 7629
Credit: 24,240,330
RAC: 0
Message 34060 - Posted: 12 Jun 2008, 20:25:32 UTC

This was noted during testing of the Mac models. (On the beta test site.)

The new Intel Macs run the models a lot faster than Windows / Linux machines.
Something to do with the design of the Mac. But the Macs have a very limited stack space, which can cause crashes.
You win some, you lose some. :)

ID: 34060 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote

Questions and Answers : Macintosh : Mac OS X vs XP? Or Merom vs Conroe?

©2024 cpdn.org