climateprediction.net (CPDN) home page
Thread 'Size of the WU in ClimatePrediction.....'

Thread 'Size of the WU in ClimatePrediction.....'

Message boards : Number crunching : Size of the WU in ClimatePrediction.....
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
ProfileDune Finkleberry
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 12 Aug 07
Posts: 34
Credit: 716,066
RAC: 92
Message 34578 - Posted: 9 Aug 2008, 15:58:57 UTC

I just started back crunching ClimatePrediction, & I\'m surprised to see this first one taking 2,935 hours to complete.

Will I live this long?
ID: 34578 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
old_user22652

Send message
Joined: 3 Oct 04
Posts: 39
Credit: 13,172,838
RAC: 0
Message 34579 - Posted: 9 Aug 2008, 16:10:08 UTC - in response to Message 34578.  


Will I live this long?

Probably, yes! This isn\'t atypical for a CPDN workunit, but there are shorter ones available, set on your \"preferences\" page. My Intel duo 8400 processors go through the longer units in about 1650 hrs.

Also, there is a great sense of satisfaction in completing a unit after that length of time.

John
ID: 34579 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profileold_user81594

Send message
Joined: 11 Jun 05
Posts: 67
Credit: 1,222,916
RAC: 0
Message 34584 - Posted: 10 Aug 2008, 11:27:02 UTC - in response to Message 34578.  

I just started back crunching ClimatePrediction, & I\'m surprised to see this first one taking 2,935 hours to complete.

Will I live this long?



Just grabbed a couple yesterday on my 950D dual-core, and the Coupled 5.44 model I got is quoting 3600hrs to complete. I know this will drop, but that sounds like a big one! That\'s 5 months roughly....

Neil.
ID: 34584 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileDune Finkleberry
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 12 Aug 07
Posts: 34
Credit: 716,066
RAC: 92
Message 34603 - Posted: 11 Aug 2008, 2:56:20 UTC

OK, thankx. At least I know that it isn\'t a mistake somehow. I\'ll get \'er whittled down in a couple of years. LOL!
ID: 34603 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileDune Finkleberry
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 12 Aug 07
Posts: 34
Credit: 716,066
RAC: 92
Message 35152 - Posted: 30 Sep 2008, 17:52:21 UTC

I just wanted everyone to know that I\'ve got my WU whittled down to 2818 hours more. LOL!

I need a quad.
ID: 35152 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profilemo.v
Volunteer moderator
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Sep 04
Posts: 2363
Credit: 14,611,758
RAC: 0
Message 35153 - Posted: 30 Sep 2008, 18:11:21 UTC

There\'s still quite a high probability that you\'ll finish the model before SETI finds ETI. But Mt St Helens may explode first.

I hope you\'re backing up the contents of the BOINC5 or BOINC6 Data folder whenever you get a chance because that\'s the only way to almost guarantee completion, particularly with the 160 year models. When I had an old slow computer it took me nearly a year to finish one of these, and that was after transferring it to a new faster machine.
Cpdn news
ID: 35153 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileAnanas
Volunteer moderator

Send message
Joined: 31 Oct 04
Posts: 336
Credit: 3,316,482
RAC: 0
Message 35154 - Posted: 30 Sep 2008, 20:01:28 UTC
Last modified: 30 Sep 2008, 20:02:15 UTC

BOINC needs to learn the duration correction factor for the combination of this project with your computer. The estimated time is set for computers with only the basic x86 command set I guess - and it\'s better to set it a bit too high so computers pull a bit less work than they can handle - rather than too much.

A few models later, your BOINC client will know (and estimate) better :-)

The slowest PC I have crunched CPDN models with is a Dual Pentium IIIs/1266 btw., quite thrilling ;-)

(that computer isn\'t visible in my host list anymore as I recycled the Host ID)
ID: 35154 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileDune Finkleberry
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 12 Aug 07
Posts: 34
Credit: 716,066
RAC: 92
Message 35155 - Posted: 30 Sep 2008, 21:20:16 UTC
Last modified: 30 Sep 2008, 21:22:01 UTC

Well the computer I\'m running is a P4 3.4 GHz hyperthreading processor with a 1.5 Gig ram.

Not really small, but no dog either. I think Climate Prediction should think about smaller WUs. Sigh. But I\'m sharing the crunching with two other projects, so I think I\'m jumping around a bit.
ID: 35155 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Les Bayliss
Volunteer moderator

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 04
Posts: 7629
Credit: 24,240,330
RAC: 0
Message 35156 - Posted: 30 Sep 2008, 21:58:17 UTC

There ARE smaller WUs; you just didn\'t select one in prefs.


Backups: Here
ID: 35156 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileDune Finkleberry
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 12 Aug 07
Posts: 34
Credit: 716,066
RAC: 92
Message 35157 - Posted: 30 Sep 2008, 22:25:53 UTC - in response to Message 35156.  
Last modified: 30 Sep 2008, 22:33:32 UTC

There ARE smaller WUs; you just didn\'t select one in prefs.


Thank you! My wife always says I don\'t read the instructions.

I\'ve updated my preferences to 1 model year. About 15 days. Now I hope that I still can continue my 1 trillion year project. At least now I can return some WUs before the world ends. :-) I probably should have read GW3PRV\'s post HERE. Serves me right I suppose.

You gotta love newbies. :-(
ID: 35157 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profilemo.v
Volunteer moderator
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Sep 04
Posts: 2363
Credit: 14,611,758
RAC: 0
Message 35170 - Posted: 3 Oct 2008, 11:08:03 UTC

We love all newbies. But when you said \'I\'ve updated my preferences to 1 model year.\' what exactly did you mean?
Cpdn news
ID: 35170 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileAnanas
Volunteer moderator

Send message
Joined: 31 Oct 04
Posts: 336
Credit: 3,316,482
RAC: 0
Message 35173 - Posted: 4 Oct 2008, 4:55:56 UTC - in response to Message 35170.  

We love all newbies. But when you said \'I\'ve updated my preferences to 1 model year.\' what exactly did you mean?


My guess : HadAM3 => Duration = 1 model year

HadAM3 are quite demanding though (RAM requirements), so if you have trouble running those, choose HadSM3 instead.
ID: 35173 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileJIM

Send message
Joined: 31 Dec 07
Posts: 1152
Credit: 22,363,583
RAC: 5,022
Message 35192 - Posted: 7 Oct 2008, 4:16:17 UTC - in response to Message 34578.  

I just started back crunching ClimatePrediction, & I\'m surprised to see this first one taking 2,935 hours to complete.

Will I live this long?



2935 hours to complete isn’t so bad. I have been running a HadC3 for 4102 hours and it is only 89% complete. I figure that it will take another 3 weeks running 24/7 to finish.

ID: 35192 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileDune Finkleberry
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 12 Aug 07
Posts: 34
Credit: 716,066
RAC: 92
Message 36926 - Posted: 14 May 2009, 1:50:27 UTC - in response to Message 35173.  

We love all newbies. But when you said 'I've updated my preferences to 1 model year.' what exactly did you mean?


My guess : HadAM3 => Duration = 1 model year

HadAM3 are quite demanding though (RAM requirements), so if you have trouble running those, choose HadSM3 instead.

You probably had that right Ananas. I picked the smallest one I could find. And now I've got 2006 hours with 45% done.

I'm hanging with this thing if it fries my computer. I've gone too long to let it go now.
ID: 36926 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote

Message boards : Number crunching : Size of the WU in ClimatePrediction.....

©2024 cpdn.org