climateprediction.net (CPDN) home page
Thread 'Win 9x/ME'

Thread 'Win 9x/ME'

Message boards : Number crunching : Win 9x/ME
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
old_user4607

Send message
Joined: 31 Aug 04
Posts: 6
Credit: 229,431
RAC: 0
Message 3291 - Posted: 7 Sep 2004, 16:21:45 UTC

I\'ve seen some posts suggesting CPDN with Boinc doesn\'t work with these OS\'s. Where can I find the official statement concerning this?
ID: 3291 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileKeck_Komputers
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 5 Aug 04
Posts: 426
Credit: 2,426,069
RAC: 0
Message 3306 - Posted: 7 Sep 2004, 17:33:36 UTC

http://climateapps2.oucs.ox.ac.uk/cpdnboinc/tech_faq_boinc.php

There you go.
<br>John Keck -- BOINCing since 2002/12/08 -- <a href="http://www.boinc.dk/index.php?page=user_statistics&amp;project=cpdn&amp;userid=191"><img border="0" height="80" src="http://191.cpdn.sig.boinc.dk?188"></a>
ID: 3306 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profileold_user156
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 5 Aug 04
Posts: 186
Credit: 1,612,182
RAC: 0
Message 3307 - Posted: 7 Sep 2004, 17:36:35 UTC
Last modified: 7 Sep 2004, 17:37:27 UTC

Bit back-to-front but <a href="http://climateapps2.oucs.ox.ac.uk/cpdnboinc/tech_faq_boinc.php">this page</a> only mentions Win2k, WinXP and WinME out of the Windows family - WinME is supposed to be supported but there is some difficulty with BOINC 4.05 under WinME and some systems won't run the CPDN project v4.03 under WinME either.

Carl, one of the developers, has stated on this messageboard that Win98 is unlikely to be supported in the future.


<a href="http://www.nmvs.dsl.pipex.com/"><img src="http://boinc.mundayweb.com/cpdn/stats.php?userID=6&amp;team=off&amp;trans=off"></a>
ID: 3307 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
old_user4607

Send message
Joined: 31 Aug 04
Posts: 6
Credit: 229,431
RAC: 0
Message 3323 - Posted: 7 Sep 2004, 18:05:46 UTC

Thanks for the replies. I'm up to BOINC 4.07 and still no joy with WinME. Just going to scratch any hope of CPDN with this OS.
ID: 3323 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profileold_user156
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 5 Aug 04
Posts: 186
Credit: 1,612,182
RAC: 0
Message 3351 - Posted: 7 Sep 2004, 18:49:13 UTC
Last modified: 8 Sep 2004, 0:04:24 UTC

Oh well, <a href="http://climateapps2.oucs.ox.ac.uk/cpdnboinc/forum_thread.php?id=660">forget about WinME being supported</a>, Carl has just now officially removed support for it both in that post and the tech FAQ. :(

<a href="http://www.nmvs.dsl.pipex.com/"><img src="http://boinc.mundayweb.com/cpdn/stats.php?userID=6&amp;team=off&amp;trans=off"></a>
ID: 3351 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
old_user1
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 5 Aug 04
Posts: 907
Credit: 299,864
RAC: 0
Message 3367 - Posted: 7 Sep 2004, 20:54:57 UTC - in response to Message 3351.  

sorry, but it's just Tolu &amp; myself to try and figure out this bizarre "small console problem" in Win98 &amp; ME &amp; NT4 and there's just too many other more important things. Win98/ME/NT4 were less than 4% of all completed models and it wouldn't be prudent for us to spend much more time trying to debug these older platforms when we have a lot to do with Linux &amp; Mac's, the sulphur cycle, coupled model, etc.

We encourage Win98 &amp; ME users (who don't want to go with Linux or upgrade to Win2K or XP) to stick with the "classic CPDN" Windows client, which will be kept running for years and years.

ID: 3367 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profileold_user156
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 5 Aug 04
Posts: 186
Credit: 1,612,182
RAC: 0
Message 3386 - Posted: 8 Sep 2004, 0:01:48 UTC
Last modified: 8 Sep 2004, 0:08:44 UTC

Yeah, maybe I didn't phrase that too well originally Carl, it wasn't intended to be hyper critical of you guys, I know you're busy with important stuff - I doubt the loss of WinME machines will make any much difference to overall numbers although there are doubtless a lot of Win98/SE/ME machines altogether. The number of models completed by them is doubtless so few because they're all slow(ish) machines anyways. ;)

Marion is still happily crunching on her classic CPDN model. :)

<a href="http://www.nmvs.dsl.pipex.com/"><img src="http://boinc.mundayweb.com/cpdn/stats.php?userID=6&amp;team=off&amp;trans=off"></a>
ID: 3386 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profileold_user156
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 5 Aug 04
Posts: 186
Credit: 1,612,182
RAC: 0
Message 3388 - Posted: 8 Sep 2004, 0:21:52 UTC

Hah, who said Win98 machines couldn't run CPDN - checkout <a href="http://climateapps2.oucs.ox.ac.uk/cpdnboinc/show_host_detail.php?hostid=24753">this machine's RAC</a>..! :shock: ;)

<a href="http://www.nmvs.dsl.pipex.com/"><img src="http://boinc.mundayweb.com/cpdn/stats.php?userID=6&amp;team=off&amp;trans=off"></a>
ID: 3388 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileThyme Lawn
Volunteer moderator

Send message
Joined: 5 Aug 04
Posts: 1283
Credit: 15,824,334
RAC: 0
Message 3421 - Posted: 8 Sep 2004, 7:53:21 UTC - in response to Message 3388.  
Last modified: 8 Sep 2004, 7:58:16 UTC

&gt; Hah, who said Win98 machines couldn't run CPDN - checkout <a href="http://climateapps2.oucs.ox.ac.uk/cpdnboinc/show_host_detail.php?hostid=24753">this machine's RAC</a>..! :shock: ;)

And that's with no trickles!

Possibly a machine merge and it's lost track of the trickles from the other one ...

... or is it a case of I spy some of the missing credits ;)

<a href="http://www.teampicard.net"><img src="http://www.teampicard.net/templates/fisubice/images/phpbb2_logo.jpg"></a><a href="http://climateapps2.oucs.ox.ac.uk/cpdnboinc/team_display.php?teamid=3">Join us here</a>
ID: 3421 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
old_user3861

Send message
Joined: 31 Aug 04
Posts: 31
Credit: 1,768,065
RAC: 0
Message 3535 - Posted: 9 Sep 2004, 0:20:20 UTC - in response to Message 3386.  

&gt; Yeah, maybe I didn't phrase that too well originally Carl, it wasn't intended
&gt; to be hyper critical of you guys, I know you're busy with important stuff - I
&gt; doubt the loss of WinME machines will make any much difference to overall
&gt; numbers although there are doubtless a lot of Win98/SE/ME machines altogether.
&gt; The number of models completed by them is doubtless so few because they're all
&gt; slow(ish) machines anyways. ;)

Win98SE is regarded by many people as the "last, best secure Windows".

You will often find it running on some of the very latest hardware - owned by people who put their own systems together (easy to do) and need "legacy" compatibility with Windows software that won't run on Linux via WINE.

I mainly run Linux (6 systems)....but I have one Win98SE box for games (my daughter) and I had a second one for a wireless card that had an unstable linux driver - and CAT5 ethernet wasn't an option for that system.

I own one copy of WinXP Home - and it has spent 90% of the past 3 years on the shelf.
<a href="http://www.boinc.dk/index.php?page=user_statistics&amp;project=cpdn&amp;userid=3861"><img border="0" height="68" src="http://3861.cpdn.sig.boinc.dk?142"></a>
ID: 3535 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
old_user1
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 5 Aug 04
Posts: 907
Credit: 299,864
RAC: 0
Message 3576 - Posted: 9 Sep 2004, 10:05:01 UTC - in response to Message 3535.  
Last modified: 9 Sep 2004, 10:05:58 UTC

&gt; Win98SE is regarded by many people as the "last, best secure Windows".
&gt; You will often find it running on some of the very latest hardware - owned by

not from my experience running multithreaded &amp; multiprocess apps, and for these climate models it's been pretty bad, hence we only have a 3.7% completion rate of the "old" CPDN on 98/ME/NT4 (and half of them were probably because "uk_nick" stuck through with 'em ;-)

it's probably fine for SETI, LHC, Predictor, folding etc, but for spawning climate modelling processes with 48MB stacks etc it always seems to run into headaches!

ID: 3576 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profileold_user122

Send message
Joined: 5 Aug 04
Posts: 6
Credit: 103,423
RAC: 0
Message 3737 - Posted: 10 Sep 2004, 14:23:26 UTC

I haven't been running CPDN on Windows very much because I don't keep my machine on for 24 hours a day, but the crunching I've done on Windows (classic CPDN) has been on Win98 SE and there have been no problems. Both two runs I've done have been full runs, and there have been no stability problems for which the cause would have seemed to be CPDN. The 3rd run is underway but is not likely to be finished anytime soon because, well, yes, I also have it around just for some gaming purposes (and previously CPDN) and nowadays I run GNU/Linux 90% of the time.

So, personally I won't miss Win9x support in BOINC ClimatePrediction, but interestingly my 98 system didn't seem to have any problems with the large CPDN classic application.
ID: 3737 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote

Message boards : Number crunching : Win 9x/ME

©2024 cpdn.org