climateprediction.net (CPDN) home page
Thread 'WORTH THE TROUBLE????'

Thread 'WORTH THE TROUBLE????'

Message boards : Number crunching : WORTH THE TROUBLE????
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2 · 3

AuthorMessage
Les Bayliss
Volunteer moderator

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 04
Posts: 7629
Credit: 24,240,330
RAC: 0
Message 46198 - Posted: 13 May 2013, 2:06:17 UTC

I haven't been "informed" about those, but Adobe does install McAfee, which I then remove with the Windows Remove tool. Maybe the next time I have to update it. <sigh>
They're all a blankity blank nuisance.



Backups: Here
ID: 46198 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileJIM

Send message
Joined: 31 Dec 07
Posts: 1152
Credit: 22,363,583
RAC: 5,022
Message 46199 - Posted: 13 May 2013, 4:08:16 UTC

The latest trick with piggyback downloads is to include them in the �standard� install. Unless you chose the �custom� install you never see the prechecked boxes (but you are excepting them) for the crapware they are trying to push into your system. They install without any further warning.

ID: 46199 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
wateroakley

Send message
Joined: 6 Aug 04
Posts: 195
Credit: 28,337,510
RAC: 10,436
Message 46200 - Posted: 13 May 2013, 8:40:25 UTC - in response to Message 46199.  

Yes, SOP by some supposedly reputable software houses to force other 'stuff' onto your computer or change settings that you don't need or want.

I was caught by the same trick as Mo recently. Note to self - always check for other unwanted 'stuff' and if in any doubt "ABORT". Unfortunately, older versions of Java have serious security flaws, so a newer version is necessary.

To copy where Les leads ... blanketty blank nuisances.
ID: 46200 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileDave Jackson
Volunteer moderator

Send message
Joined: 15 May 09
Posts: 4540
Credit: 19,011,472
RAC: 21,368
Message 46201 - Posted: 13 May 2013, 13:54:50 UTC - in response to Message 46200.  

Exactly the sort of thing that led me to defenestrate (to borrow a term I learned somewhere on these boards) over 10 years ago :)
ID: 46201 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profilemo.v
Volunteer moderator
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Sep 04
Posts: 2363
Credit: 14,611,758
RAC: 0
Message 46205 - Posted: 13 May 2013, 18:46:37 UTC
Last modified: 13 May 2013, 18:49:23 UTC

That would be my ideal route to follow.

In the meantime Jim's advice to always choose the custom install is the way to go.
Cpdn news
ID: 46205 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileRon Crouch
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 24 Feb 05
Posts: 45
Credit: 11,332,534
RAC: 0
Message 46223 - Posted: 14 May 2013, 20:23:05 UTC

Defenestrate the OS. There's are better ones, and they are totally free
6,000?? Give it a rest.

G�bekli Tepe is more than 10,000 years old. And quite intricate I might add.

Explain that!
ID: 46223 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileJIM

Send message
Joined: 31 Dec 07
Posts: 1152
Credit: 22,363,583
RAC: 5,022
Message 46602 - Posted: 8 Jul 2013, 19:51:38 UTC

I have reactivated this thread because I have noticed something. The hadcm3n WU�s have stopped failing. I know earlier in this thread I said that I was going to stop running them, but, I had 5 hadcm3n WU�s on my machines (and wasn�t going to waste them) so I decided just to run them until they failed. Then they just stopped failing. Nothing else changed. No changes to my machines or the way I was using them.

Maybe I was just having a string of bad luck with the WU�s I was drawing. More likely, I think is was the WU�s themselves. I think it likely the Scientists were testing a set of WU�s that had extreme settings and that they knew that most of them would fail.

I realize that the Scientists learn almost as much from finding out what doesn�t work as what does, but, I would be nice if they would let know this in advance. It would allow us to know that we weren�t just wasting our time and electricity. A bump in credits for running these �high risk� WU�s would ensure that they get run. After all, it�s not like the credits cost CPDN anything.

So I guess I was wrong, running Hadcm3n is worth the trouble.
ID: 46602 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Jim1348

Send message
Joined: 15 Jan 06
Posts: 637
Credit: 26,751,529
RAC: 653
Message 46603 - Posted: 8 Jul 2013, 20:42:54 UTC - in response to Message 46602.  
Last modified: 8 Jul 2013, 20:53:37 UTC

I have reactivated this thread because I have noticed something. The hadcm3n WU�s have stopped failing. I know earlier in this thread I said that I was going to stop running them, but, I had 5 hadcm3n WU�s on my machines (and wasn�t going to waste them) so I decided just to run them until they failed. Then they just stopped failing. Nothing else changed. No changes to my machines or the way I was using them.

I have seen no failures since 18 June, and thought it was due to some change in my hardware, or the BOINC projects I run.

I guess not.
ID: 46603 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Eirik Redd

Send message
Joined: 31 Aug 04
Posts: 391
Credit: 219,896,461
RAC: 649
Message 46606 - Posted: 9 Jul 2013, 4:06:17 UTC
Last modified: 9 Jul 2013, 4:29:22 UTC

Yup - seems the same here -- had only one "INVALID THETA" in the last month or so.
And the mains power here has survived several thunderstorms that took out half a million homes for 1-4 days. Lucky.

But then I've wasted several wu's with new installs and trying to set up virtualization --

Many models I'm running seem to have failed on machines that get "can't find track" or "device does not" -- no way around that kind of error on this distributed project.

e
ID: 46606 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileKeith Jillings

Send message
Joined: 2 Feb 08
Posts: 8
Credit: 525,755
RAC: 0
Message 46717 - Posted: 27 Jul 2013, 13:39:55 UTC

The last WU I had kept triggering error messages that BOINC asked to be terminated in a non-standard way (or words to that effect). It took a while to work out which project/WU was causng the problem till I watched to see which one was taking CPU time without progressing.

That was two weeks ago. Since then, I've not received any WUs from CPN. Is there something I need to do to re-enable it?
ID: 46717 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Les Bayliss
Volunteer moderator

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 04
Posts: 7629
Credit: 24,240,330
RAC: 0
Message 46719 - Posted: 27 Jul 2013, 14:14:21 UTC - in response to Message 46717.  

For part of that time the project was down with a hard disk failure/replacement/raid rebuild.
And since then there's been no work available, which is often the case here.
The server status page can be accessed through the blue menu to the left of here, 5 from the bottom.

ID: 46719 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3

Message boards : Number crunching : WORTH THE TROUBLE????

©2024 cpdn.org