climateprediction.net (CPDN) home page
Thread 'Computing preferences'

Thread 'Computing preferences'

Message boards : Number crunching : Computing preferences
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Dave Roberts

Send message
Joined: 15 Jan 11
Posts: 175
Credit: 6,242,691
RAC: 699
Message 49607 - Posted: 23 Jul 2014, 9:23:11 UTC

Just out of interest, in 'Computing preferences' I have 'Maintain enough work for an additional' 10 days but never get more than a couple of tasks at a time. In the last few cases, about 4 days worth at a time. I once tried putting this variable to 24 but it got reset back to 10.
Any current limitations on number of tasks downloaded per person?
ID: 49607 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileDave Jackson
Volunteer moderator

Send message
Joined: 15 May 09
Posts: 4538
Credit: 19,008,987
RAC: 21,524
Message 49608 - Posted: 23 Jul 2014, 9:54:45 UTC - in response to Message 49607.  

Any current limitations on number of tasks downloaded per person?


Not sure about limit/no of work units, I currently have two running and two in the queue did have three or four recently. Do you have non running units suspended? If you do, it won't download any more until those are un-suspended.
ID: 49608 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Dave Roberts

Send message
Joined: 15 Jan 11
Posts: 175
Credit: 6,242,691
RAC: 699
Message 49610 - Posted: 23 Jul 2014, 14:49:33 UTC - in response to Message 49608.  

Just two tasks in the system.
ID: 49610 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileDave Jackson
Volunteer moderator

Send message
Joined: 15 May 09
Posts: 4538
Credit: 19,008,987
RAC: 21,524
Message 49611 - Posted: 23 Jul 2014, 15:07:26 UTC - in response to Message 49610.  
Last modified: 23 Jul 2014, 15:34:46 UTC

I know this sounds obvious but have you set both minimum and maximum work buffer to 10 days which is the highest it accepts?

And with that setting, I have just downloaded another two tasks and now have 4 in the queue. (my box only has two cores on the processor.)
ID: 49611 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileJIM

Send message
Joined: 31 Dec 07
Posts: 1152
Credit: 22,363,583
RAC: 5,022
Message 49616 - Posted: 23 Jul 2014, 20:52:40 UTC

The way that I understand the system; if you set your work buffer for 10 day, that�s 240 hours. Boinc will then send 240 hours of work for each core that you are allowing it to use. (If you have not restricted the number of cores that Boinc can use this number will be the same as the number of cores in you CPU.)

Boinc will base it�s calculation on the type of WU�s you have selected and your computers CPU clock speed, and it's past history running that type. Sometimes it can be very inaccurate with time estimates, especially with model types that you have not run before. The process is (slowly) self-correcting as you finish several WU�s.

ID: 49616 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Dave Roberts

Send message
Joined: 15 Jan 11
Posts: 175
Credit: 6,242,691
RAC: 699
Message 49617 - Posted: 23 Jul 2014, 23:38:04 UTC - in response to Message 49616.  

Just realised the problem. I was running MalariaControl tasks when CPDN was pretty inactive and had set different parameters for BOINC - had forgotten to change them back. (One can't have different preferences for different projects - mores the pity)
Apologies for the confusion but thanks for your replies.

ID: 49617 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Dave Roberts

Send message
Joined: 15 Jan 11
Posts: 175
Credit: 6,242,691
RAC: 699
Message 49645 - Posted: 26 Jul 2014, 9:58:00 UTC - in response to Message 49617.  

It looks as though I spoke too soon. Despite resetting the parameters, It's still the same situation.

Computer is connected to the Internet about every etc ... is blank
Maintain enough work for an additional .......................... 10

These parameters are set to be the same in both projects and and have been updated in BOINC.

It's very strange, as BOINC always used to down load additional work. (On both projects) I thought I'd found the cure but updating BOINC hasn't changed the situation.

Perhaps having reset the parameters, BOINC has gone back to init conditions on my account & is recalculating everything again. So as Jim says, it might be self correcting!!



[/u]
ID: 49645 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Eirik Redd

Send message
Joined: 31 Aug 04
Posts: 391
Credit: 219,896,461
RAC: 649
Message 49646 - Posted: 26 Jul 2014, 10:32:26 UTC

Look under"Advanced" and "Event Log"
Do you see "not reporting or requesting tasks" or do you see "Don't need"
If you see "don't need" BOINC estimates you have enough work to keep your machine busy for whatever work you've got already, for the amount of time you specified in <work_buf_min_days>0.3</work_buf_min_days>
<work_buf_additional_days>0.3</work_buf_additional_days>

Sometimes BOINC totally miscalculates.


ID: 49646 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Dave Roberts

Send message
Joined: 15 Jan 11
Posts: 175
Credit: 6,242,691
RAC: 699
Message 49652 - Posted: 26 Jul 2014, 15:39:56 UTC - in response to Message 49646.  

I'm getting "Not reporting or requesting tasks" . I get new tasks uploaded when current tasks are within a day of finishing. This would fit with having "Computer is connected to the Internet about every etc ..." set to 1. This is what I used a while back in the Malaria control settings. Since then I have set this to "blank" via update to both CPDN & Malaria Control accounts. Accessing my account from both projects shows the "blank" setting.

On second thoughts I don't see why this parameter should affect amounts of tasks when there is another parameter specifically for that purpose. (Maintain enough work for an additional..)
The phrase "BOINC will try to maintain at least this much work." does not imply setting a total lower limit, rather a sort of maximin boundary. In Malaria control I also had "Maintain enough work for an additional" set to 1 and was using (I thought) the "Computer is connected.. " parameter to be able to vary the Activity settings.

Perhaps I could simply try to stop & restart BOINC!!
ID: 49652 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote

Message boards : Number crunching : Computing preferences

©2024 cpdn.org