Thread 'Should hadcm3s "No Resubmission" be aborted?'

Author	Message
Jim1348 Send message Joined: 15 Jan 06 Posts: 637 Credit: 26,751,529 RAC: 653	Message 51850 - Posted: 18 Apr 2015, 18:37:07 UTC I have one machine set to receive the hadcm3s work units only, and have been getting mostly ones marked "No Resubmission". I have been aborting the ones from 2007, since I know that they will fail. However, I have been allowing the other years to run, and they have been successful thus far. http://climateapps2.oerc.ox.ac.uk/cpdnboinc/results.php?hostid=1349694&offset=0&show_names=1&state=0 But are they of any use, or should they also be aborted if marked "No Resubmission"? ID: 51850 · Reply Quote

Iain Inglis Volunteer moderator Send message Joined: 16 Jan 10 Posts: 1084 Credit: 7,826,970 RAC: 5,066	Message 51854 - Posted: 19 Apr 2015, 14:05:26 UTC The general rule is that the reappearance of work units marked "no resubmission" is a BOINC/CPDN server error, so they should be aborted. I know of no reason to excuse these units that fate. ID: 51854 · Reply Quote

Jim1348 Send message Joined: 15 Jan 06 Posts: 637 Credit: 26,751,529 RAC: 653	Message 51855 - Posted: 19 Apr 2015, 14:41:13 UTC - in response to Message 51854. OK, simple enough. ID: 51855 · Reply Quote