It looks like 18,720 more of batch 583 (WUS25/25) and 4,800 more of batch 585 (PNW25/16) - batch list.

Dave: On my Windows machine the WUS25/25 tasks take about three times as long as the GLOBAL25/25.

Dave: On my Windows machine the WUS25/25 tasks take about three times as long as the GLOBAL25/25.

Not had any of the wus till now. -Obviously actually running the tasks is more informative than the estimated Gflops.

Not had any of the wus till now. -Obviously actually running the tasks is more informative than the estimated Gflops.

Got few of them it seems it will be >300h per WU on my slowish Core2 Duo and i5-2520M

... and 1500 (PNW25/49), batch #588 (batch list).

... and 3600 (SAS50/8), batch #589 (batch list).

It looks like my 6 year-old Mac has blown up in the heat, and I've had to turn all the office machines off for the same reason - so I won't be getting any of this batch.

It looks like my 6 year-old Mac has blown up in the heat, and I've had to turn all the office machines off for the same reason - so I won't be getting any of this batch.

I have had to restrict my desktop to using one out of two cores. It kept freezing for long periods.

... and 7,200 more SAS50/8, batch #590 (batch list).

It looks like my 6 year-old Mac has blown up in the heat, and I've had to turn all the office machines off for the same reason - so I won't be getting any of this batch.

I have had to restrict my desktop to using one out of two cores. It kept freezing for long periods.

Strange phenomena are happening: some computers run too hot, others are freezing...

And a few thousand more with batch 591 though not sure where to look for the actualnumber sent out.

And a few thousand more with batch 591 though not sure where to look for the actualnumber sent out.

... now you've drawn my attention to it - here!

... now you've drawn my attention to it - here!

Except.... I was really looking for where you get the information to post into that thread.

... now you've drawn my attention to it - here!

Except.... I was really looking for where you get the information to post into that thread.

My process is as follows:

1. A browser bookmark is set to point to the first non-null work unit. If that shows an actual work unit then there's a new batch.

2. I then add 10, 100, 1000 etc to the work unit number until the page shows no work unit or an even higher batch.

3. Then binary chop between "work unit in batch" and "work unit not in batch" to find the last work unit in the batch.

4. The first and last work unit names are then added to a spreadsheet that does most of the rest, including the formatting.

5. Update bookmark to new first non-null work unit.

6. A day or two after the batch appears the RSS feed on the CPDN front page is updated and the descriptive text is then copied from that. (It would be nice to get the address of that and then the text wouldn't be missed.)

Cutting through a binary jungle with a binary chopper is pretty quick!

Thanks Ian,

All within my level of geedom.

Which I make it about 7,000 of 592 have been released.

My i5 was running at 93deg last night. Now restricted to 3 cores.

My i5 was running at 93deg last night. Now restricted to 3 cores.

Running 4 wah2_8.25_i686-pc-linux-gnu processes

# sensors
coretemp-isa-0000
Adapter: ISA adapter
Physical id 0: +48.0°C (high = +78.0°C, crit = +88.0°C)
Core 0: +46.0°C (high = +78.0°C, crit = +88.0°C)
Core 1: +44.0°C (high = +78.0°C, crit = +88.0°C)
Core 2: +47.0°C (high = +78.0°C, crit = +88.0°C)
Core 3: +45.0°C (high = +78.0°C, crit = +88.0°C)

---

Alan K -

I would take a look at your cooling situation.

Fans running at full speed?
Dust in the fans or CPU cooling fins?
Dust in the air intake/exit holes?
Cooling plate firmly attached to CPU? (Sometimes the plastic retainers pop out of the MB).
etc.

It would in interesting to know the CPU temp at 0 cores running, 1, 2, 3, and 4 with the same room temp.

---

My immediate guess is dust in the cooling fins. I will have a look next week - visitors over the weekend and a cricket match on Sunday. BTW outside temperature was over 30C!

No core running (about 3% usage on each core) temperature is about 47C.

Some test models by the look of it 10 x SAM25/120 (batch 593) and 10 x NAM50/120 (batch 594).

NAM looks like a new region definition, North America presumably - WB8ILI, if you're watching, if you send me the model Zip for the NAM50 model that you've got then I'll plot out the region ...