Message boards : Number crunching : Model uploaded/finished/reported, but still in progress on the web
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 6 Nov 06 Posts: 8 Credit: 1,522,758 RAC: 0 |
Another `ghost` wu Completed but not on my computer anymore; http://climateapps2.oerc.ox.ac.uk/cpdnboinc/result.php?resultid=19944779 So feel free to delete / resend.. |
Send message Joined: 18 Jul 13 Posts: 438 Credit: 25,710,161 RAC: 5,793 |
It seems the model I started the thread with is no longer "In progress" but "Abandoned". One can see the following status: Received 25 Nov 2016, 21:49:33 UTC (though completed on 7 Oct ) so I have no idea what it means or what caused it. I hope it reached the researchers. I also looked at some of the other WAHs reported here and they seem to be still in progress. Mystery to me it is. |
Send message Joined: 5 Sep 04 Posts: 7629 Credit: 24,240,330 RAC: 0 |
Also, both Run time and CPU time are empty in the model page, and 0.00 in the Tasks list. Even though all of the trickles seem to be there, and it was given credits. I too am puzzled. |
Send message Joined: 15 May 09 Posts: 4541 Credit: 19,039,635 RAC: 18,944 |
Mine is still showing as in progress. despite all the trickles being there and the credit granted. - Prompted to check by the previous posts. http://climateapps2.oerc.ox.ac.uk/cpdnboinc/result.php?resultid=19976711 Dave |
Send message Joined: 18 Jul 13 Posts: 438 Credit: 25,710,161 RAC: 5,793 |
I have 3 hadam3p_eu WUs that are gone from BOINC's task tab but are still in progress on the web: hadam3p_eu_ltcl_201611_3_482_010804528_0 hadam3p_eu_luo8_201611_3_482_010806243_0 hadam3p_eu_lupx_201611_3_481_010802680_0 |
Send message Joined: 18 Jul 13 Posts: 438 Credit: 25,710,161 RAC: 5,793 |
One more WU (wah2_pnw25_c158_200312_48_485_010813435_0) has finished and uploaded, but still in progress. |
Send message Joined: 27 Jan 07 Posts: 300 Credit: 3,288,263 RAC: 26,370 |
I've got a model that I reported as abort, long ago. But the website says still in progress: https://www.cpdn.org/cpdnboinc/result.php?resultid=17525647 This seems to be a systemic problem with CPDN. |
Send message Joined: 5 Sep 04 Posts: 7629 Credit: 24,240,330 RAC: 0 |
I did report this problem late last year, but nothing could be found that was wrong. I'll ask again next week. |
Send message Joined: 15 May 09 Posts: 4541 Credit: 19,039,635 RAC: 18,944 |
Interestingly, the one I had now has the status of, "Abandoned" instead of, "in progress."However when searching for particular tasks that isn't available as a way of searching, you have to click on the, "error" tab to find tasks listed as abandoned. Too late to look on my computer now but I wonder if there was a problem with the upload of the final zip file or something? |
Send message Joined: 20 Dec 14 Posts: 23 Credit: 2,450,095 RAC: 296 |
BOINC requires that the BOINC client report the completion of tasks before they are marked as complete to the server in order to prevent the server from trying to process tasks whose uploads are not yet complete (e.g. the internet connection failed during the middle of uploading one of the files of the result). Have you verified that the work unit is not sitting in your list of tasks waiting to be reported? If it is, then you could click the update button after selecting the project in the projects tab to force the BOINC client to transmit the completion message. Otherwise, you could wait for it to automatically contact the project, and the completion message will be transmitted then. If the task is not in the project tab and there are no more tasks for the project in the queue, you could detach from and reattach to the project to cause the server to mark the task as abandoned, so the work unit can be reprocessed by another computer. Doing this while there are other Climateprediction.net tasks left in the queue will cause you to lose progress in those tasks, so you should set the project to no new tasks mode to ensure that your computer does not get any work and that your computer could drain the queue of remaining tasks. You will still get credit for the lost task due to the trickles for the lost task that were reported. |
Send message Joined: 18 Jul 13 Posts: 438 Credit: 25,710,161 RAC: 5,793 |
Thanks Jesse, but I've been closely monitoring all the tasks reported here, so they all finished nicely in BOINC and has been reported as finished (log checked). These has been on different machines WIN7, ubuntu with WINE so my guess is the problem is not client side. |
Send message Joined: 5 Jul 09 Posts: 63 Credit: 6,091,274 RAC: 0 |
Workunit finished uploaded and reported but still listed as in progress on web https://www.cpdn.org/cpdnboinc/result.php?resultid=20116340 Kevin |
Send message Joined: 5 Sep 04 Posts: 7629 Credit: 24,240,330 RAC: 0 |
OK, this is a bit much. The reason given back in December was "it may have been the transitioner not running". (There was nothing in the server logs.) But now it seems to be ongoing, so another email. |
Send message Joined: 5 Sep 04 Posts: 7629 Credit: 24,240,330 RAC: 0 |
|
Send message Joined: 18 Jul 13 Posts: 438 Credit: 25,710,161 RAC: 5,793 |
I've just cleaned mine by detaching and re-attaching again. I now have only one orphaned hadcm3n_7jft_1980_40_008436476_2 that does not fit the category of WUs reported here and with a deadline 2023. |
Send message Joined: 31 Dec 07 Posts: 1152 Credit: 22,363,583 RAC: 5,022 |
I've just cleaned mine by detaching and re-attaching again. I now have only one orphaned hadcm3n_7jft_1980_40_008436476_2 that does not fit the category of WUs reported here and with a deadline 2023. If I remember correctly, the WU’s that were sent out with deadlines of 2023 were “no resubmission” WU’s that somehow slipped back into the que and were sent out by mistake. |
Send message Joined: 22 Feb 06 Posts: 491 Credit: 31,366,450 RAC: 15,463 |
The -2 at the end of the task number indicates its the third issue of this task and therefore probably the last. First issue would be -0 and second issue -1. Interestingly looking at the model its initial incarnation - (back in 2013!) - is labelled as "didn't need". |
Send message Joined: 18 Jul 13 Posts: 438 Credit: 25,710,161 RAC: 5,793 |
The -2 at the end of the task number indicates its the third issue of this task and therefore probably the last. First issue would be -0 and second issue -1. Interestingly looking at the model its initial incarnation - (back in 2013!) - is labelled as "didn't need". Yeah, I got this one in 2013, the machine was disconnected and I drag this one for some years. |
Send message Joined: 5 Sep 04 Posts: 7629 Credit: 24,240,330 RAC: 0 |
"didn't need" was intended to indicate to the server that it wasn't to be re-issued. But that didn't work. A deadline of 2023 was another attempt to stop re-issues. The date was changed after the first attempt was reported. It'll be a while before that one shows up again. |
Send message Joined: 5 Jul 09 Posts: 63 Credit: 6,091,274 RAC: 0 |
Got another one:-( https://www.cpdn.org/cpdnboinc/result.php?resultid=20117981 I have suspended the WU at 99.700%, so still have files on computer. Kevin |
©2024 cpdn.org