climateprediction.net home page
safr50 models batches 789 & 790

safr50 models batches 789 & 790

Message boards : Number crunching : safr50 models batches 789 & 790
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Les Bayliss
Volunteer moderator

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 04
Posts: 7629
Credit: 24,240,330
RAC: 0
Message 59744 - Posted: 8 Mar 2019, 21:17:12 UTC

The failures so far may just be random chance. We'll only know after some have finished.

One that I picked up had failed after 2 minutes, but is nearly half an hour into it on my computer.
ID: 59744 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Dave Jackson
Volunteer moderator

Send message
Joined: 15 May 09
Posts: 4535
Credit: 18,966,742
RAC: 21,869
Message 59745 - Posted: 8 Mar 2019, 21:57:29 UTC - in response to Message 59744.  
Last modified: 9 Mar 2019, 6:38:49 UTC

43 of batch 789 have completed when I looked yesterday.
ID: 59745 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Dave Jackson
Volunteer moderator

Send message
Joined: 15 May 09
Posts: 4535
Credit: 18,966,742
RAC: 21,869
Message 59747 - Posted: 9 Mar 2019, 12:13:21 UTC

Now at 115 completed vs 901 failed for 789.
ID: 59747 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Les Bayliss
Volunteer moderator

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 04
Posts: 7629
Credit: 24,240,330
RAC: 0
Message 59751 - Posted: 9 Mar 2019, 22:21:42 UTC

The 789 that I picked up produced it's first zip at 6.4%, 4 hours 22 minutes.
I've stopped it again, to complete the original 4.
ID: 59751 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Dave Jackson
Volunteer moderator

Send message
Joined: 15 May 09
Posts: 4535
Credit: 18,966,742
RAC: 21,869
Message 59759 - Posted: 10 Mar 2019, 6:53:53 UTC

Figures on batch 789 now at
Success: 281 (3%)
Fails: 1045 (12%)
Hard Fail: 5 (0%)
Running: 5381 (63%)
Unsent: 2912 (34%)

The numbers of 790 are still low enough that the percentages don't mean a lot except perhaps fails now up to 9 %.
ID: 59759 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Jim1348

Send message
Joined: 15 Jan 06
Posts: 637
Credit: 26,751,529
RAC: 653
Message 59761 - Posted: 10 Mar 2019, 13:09:09 UTC - in response to Message 59759.  

I now have four successes on my 789's, after three failures. And several more are now running past the point of the failures. So I think they are getting better. (It is similar with the 790's thus far.)
ID: 59761 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Dave Jackson
Volunteer moderator

Send message
Joined: 15 May 09
Posts: 4535
Credit: 18,966,742
RAC: 21,869
Message 59762 - Posted: 10 Mar 2019, 13:54:49 UTC - in response to Message 59761.  

I now have four successes on my 789's, after three failures. And several more are now running past the point of the failures. So I think they are getting better. (It is similar with the 790's thus far.)


I will check on the batch statistics again tomorrow and see how things are progressing. It will be interesting to see if the failures all turn into hard failures i.e. all three attempts fail.
ID: 59762 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Alan K

Send message
Joined: 22 Feb 06
Posts: 491
Credit: 30,945,228
RAC: 13,933
Message 59775 - Posted: 10 Mar 2019, 22:59:00 UTC - in response to Message 59761.  

I've got four 789s at various stages between 2.5% and 29% completed on my i5. Fingers crossed.
ID: 59775 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote

Message boards : Number crunching : safr50 models batches 789 & 790

©2024 cpdn.org