batches closed

Author	Message
Les Bayliss Volunteer moderator Send message Joined: 5 Sep 04 Posts: 7629 Credit: 24,240,330 RAC: 0	Message 63543 - Posted: 18 Feb 2021, 12:24:23 UTC batch 866 There were about 67 tasks still struggling along on their 3rd attempt. ID: 63543 · Reply Quote

Alan K Send message Joined: 22 Feb 06 Posts: 491 Credit: 30,942,743 RAC: 14,140	Message 63544 - Posted: 18 Feb 2021, 23:17:06 UTC - in response to Message 63543. Thanks. ID: 63544 · Reply Quote

bernard_ivo Send message Joined: 18 Jul 13 Posts: 438 Credit: 25,620,508 RAC: 4,981	Message 63588 - Posted: 2 Mar 2021, 12:42:38 UTC Hi, I just got one from batch 837 from 2019 - hadcm3s_qu49_190012_240_837 on its 2nd attempt. Its 1st attend status is - Didn't need. Should I crunch it? It is on a new machine attached to the project, so I might as well monitor whether it behaves well, but still if the WU is not needed, then should move to a more recent batch. ID: 63588 · Reply Quote

Dave Jackson Volunteer moderator Send message Joined: 15 May 09 Posts: 4535 Credit: 18,962,600 RAC: 21,639	Message 63592 - Posted: 2 Mar 2021, 21:19:46 UTC - in response to Message 63588. Hi, I just got one from batch 837 from 2019 - hadcm3s_qu49_190012_240_837 on its 2nd attempt. Its 1st attend status is - Didn't need. Should I crunch it? It is on a new machine attached to the project, so I might as well monitor whether it behaves well, but still if the WU is not needed, then should move to a more recent batch. #837 has had a few thousand more poured into the hopper. I suspect that the "didn't need" status of the first attempt means it has been re-released because they changed their minds or because of the date the original batch went out despite appearances it is a new task. Please do not private message myself or other moderators for help. This limits the number of people who are able to help and deprives others who may benefit from the answer. ID: 63592 · Reply Quote