I don't know which server they were going to. Would that info still be around and how would one look it up? A couple of example tasks:

Found it, it is upload11. Knowing the server is most useful when zips are not getting uploaded. It can be found at the time by going to client_state.xml and looking for where uploads go to. I was asking on the off chance that you had looked it up. Thinking about it, it probably won't make much difference because it probably a script that stopped running to handle the trickle ups.

Edit: I had to go somewhere only the moderators have access to to find it. (Now I know where it is going to be really easy.

Over the last few weeks, a lot of my tasks have uploaded. And if I look at the CPDN web site for my tasks, almost all of them have received credit. Yet if I look at my projects list, my average work done has steadily decreased to about 50.54. If I look at the statistics graph for the last month, it has dropped from 1600 to about 50.

I am confused that the CPDN web site seems to know I have received lots of credit but wherever the projects list and the statistics graph get their data from, they have not been getting the credits for a month or so.

Notice: my signature box (below) seems to know I am getting credits (though I do not know if it is up-to-date).

---

my signature box (below) seems to know I am getting credits (though I do not know if it is up-to-date).

Your signature box is getting its information through Boincstats.
Boincstats is calculating your average credit on its own.
Projects differ about how to calculate their average, so it's fine to have a single method through Boincstats.

---

- - - - - - - - - -
Greetings, Jens

Over the last few weeks, a lot of my tasks have uploaded. And if I look at the CPDN web site for my tasks, almost all of them have received credit. Yet if I look at my projects list, my average work done has steadily decreased to about 50.54. If I look at the statistics graph for the last month, it has dropped from 1600 to about 50.

I am confused that the CPDN web site seems to know I have received lots of credit but wherever the projects list and the statistics graph get their data from, they have not been getting the credits for a month or so.

Notice: my signature box (below) seems to know I am getting credits (though I do not know if it is up-to-date).

I’d second this.

Over the past month I’ve accumulated about 275,000 credits (about 240,000 over the past fortnight) and Boinc is showing a RAC of 12.05 overall and zero for the host that’s doing the work.

BoincStats is showing no better.

BOINC is showing its weekly increase in credit from CPDN today on my machine. If not showing on BOINCSTATS, I wonder if CPDN have changed something so BOINCSTATS is looking in the wrong place or the page where it looks hasn't been updated for some reason. If it looks either is the case I will email Andy.

BOINC is showing its weekly increase in credit from CPDN today. If not showing on BOINCSTATS, I wonder if CPDN have changed something so BOINCSTATS is looking in the wrong place or the page where it looks hasn't been updated for some reason. If it looks like that is the case I will email Andy.

It’s the CPDN account management page that’s not being updated before it goes to BoincStats. I think the delay to BS is just that the update missed the cutoff.

And I'll third it.

BOINCstats keeps track of both the project's average (the 'RAC' you see below our names to the left), and its own rather more agile calculation. Here's mine:



As you can see, the blue line (CPDN's calculation) is falling, where BOINCstats' calculation is rising. It seems to have gone wrong in the last week of November, round about the time that credit stopped being awarded for the Hadley models. Also, although credit was re-calculated here at CPDN this morning, the new figures haven't been collected by BOINCstats yet - they usually collect and process them in the early afternoon.

BOINCstats keeps track of both the project's average (the 'RAC' you see below our names to the left), and its own rather more agile calculation.

Mine is nothing like yours. I wonder why.

http://www.boincstats.com/stats/-1/user/detail/27086/charts

---

I wonder why.

Because you looked at the page for 'combined' stats - all the BOINC projects you've ever crunched, added together. These are your stats for CPDN by itself:

If they have a credit script running once a week and not using the default Boinc process do they also run a RAC script to update the RAC as well ? If so, it might need a kick.

Thank you.

---

I'm hoping that moving all that stuff off the upload server won't cause issues when trying to fix the missing credit problem for Hadley models, which is still ongoing by the way, i.e. recently finished tasks aren't getting credit. I think many of the Hadley models also upload to upload11 server.

I have the problem too (no credit) :

https://www.cpdn.org/results.php?hostid=1532321&offset=0&show_names=0&state=4&appid=

The upload server is : 11



Kali.

---

The issues with OIFS have died down enough now. I have informed Andy and linked to this thread.

I have the problem too (no credit) :

https://www.cpdn.org/results.php?hostid=1532321&offset=0&show_names=0&state=4&appid=

The upload server is : 11



Kali.

Some of those tasks were after the credit script should have run on Sunday. Not sure why the others are not showing credit. I will do some digging and then let Andy know there are some issues with OIFS credit as well as for Hadley models.

A HadAM4 task one of my hosts was running that was marked as completed on 16 Jan 2023 still has not appeared as a credit on the stats websites. It looks like the final trickle didn't receive any credit:

https://www.cpdn.org/result.php?resultid=22197505

---

A HadAM4 task one of my hosts was running that was marked as completed on 16 Jan 2023 still has not appeared as a credit on the stats websites. It looks like the final trickle didn't receive any credit:

https://www.cpdn.org/result.php?resultid=22197505

From Andy yesterday.

Hi Dave,

Thank you yes. The run last week was interrupted by the deployment of an updated app. I can set it running sooner or we can wait for it to run again this week.
Best wishes,

Andy

If after next weekend's run of the script there is no change i will message Andy again.

A HadAM4 task one of my hosts was running that was marked as completed on 16 Jan 2023 still has not appeared as a credit on the stats websites. It looks like the final trickle didn't receive any credit:

This is a known issue that's been going on since at least the end of November. Most of the messages above yours are regarding this same problem. Unfortunately it's unlikely to get fixed until after the current upload issue gets resolved and who knows when that's going to happen.

A HadAM4 task one of my hosts was running that was marked as completed on 16 Jan 2023 still has not appeared as a credit on the stats websites. It looks like the final trickle didn't receive any credit:

This is a known issue that's been going on since at least the end of November. Most of the messages above yours are regarding this same problem. Unfortunately it's unlikely to get fixed until after the current upload issue gets resolved and who knows when that's going to happen.

After next run I will link this thread in my email to Andy.

There is also the problem that the "average credit" (RAC) is not being calculated for IFS tasks. I don't that there's any significance to a particular credit run having been interrupted: it's happened every Sunday since 4 December 2022, when the first IFS credit was granted.