climateprediction.net home page
Lost 200 hours of work after downgrade from 4.09 to 4.05

Lost 200 hours of work after downgrade from 4.09 to 4.05

Questions and Answers : Windows : Lost 200 hours of work after downgrade from 4.09 to 4.05
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
old_user2792

Send message
Joined: 29 Aug 04
Posts: 11
Credit: 84,158
RAC: 0
Message 4945 - Posted: 2 Oct 2004, 12:14:37 UTC

I was about half way through a 400 hour climateprediction work unit & upgraded from BOINC v4.05 to 4.09. After the upgrade, my BOINC software hung. I have now managed to downgrade back to v4.05 but my cimateprediction work unit is gone & the software is .02% though a new work unit.

Is my old work unit lost?
ID: 4945 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Andrew Hingston
Volunteer moderator

Send message
Joined: 17 Aug 04
Posts: 753
Credit: 9,804,700
RAC: 0
Message 4946 - Posted: 2 Oct 2004, 12:44:41 UTC

Unfortunately, the only way of recovering a WU in this situation is from a backup. Given the problems a few people have experienced in upgrading, the advice has to be to make a backup of the entire BOINC directory before upgrading, and regularly besides. If things go wrong, it should then be a simple matter of copying the directory back.
ID: 4946 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
old_user2792

Send message
Joined: 29 Aug 04
Posts: 11
Credit: 84,158
RAC: 0
Message 4953 - Posted: 2 Oct 2004, 16:45:33 UTC - in response to Message 4946.  

> Unfortunately, the only way of recovering a WU in this situation is from a
> backup. Given the problems a few people have experienced in upgrading, the
> advice has to be to make a backup of the entire BOINC directory before
> upgrading, and regularly besides. If things go wrong, it should then be a
> simple matter of copying the directory back.
>

Thanks for your reply

Regards
Nick
ID: 4953 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
old_user355

Send message
Joined: 7 Aug 04
Posts: 187
Credit: 44,163
RAC: 0
Message 4959 - Posted: 2 Oct 2004, 20:03:41 UTC

Also note that if you are also running S@H, you will not be given any more work if you are using CC 4.05.

<a href="http://www.boinc.dk/index.php?page=user_statistics&amp;project=cpdn&amp;userid=355"><img border="0" height="80" src="http://355.cpdn.sig.boinc.dk?188"></a>
ID: 4959 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
old_user2792

Send message
Joined: 29 Aug 04
Posts: 11
Credit: 84,158
RAC: 0
Message 5030 - Posted: 4 Oct 2004, 10:11:48 UTC - in response to Message 4959.  

&gt; Also note that if you are also running S@H, you will not be given any more
&gt; work if you are using CC 4.05.
&gt;
&gt; <a> href="http://www.boinc.dk/index.php?page=user_statistics&amp;project=cpdn&amp;userid=355"&gt;<img> border="0" height="80" src="http://355.cpdn.sig.boinc.dk?188"&gt;</a>
&gt;

That's a good point. However v4.09 is unstable on my system, it simply will not run. I now have both network pcs running v4.05 problem free - apart from no Seti units. I'll wait for a new version before trying an upgrade again. BTW My processor is running in HT mode.
ID: 5030 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile old_user17289

Send message
Joined: 13 Sep 04
Posts: 228
Credit: 354,979
RAC: 0
Message 6579 - Posted: 5 Dec 2004, 23:35:54 UTC - in response to Message 5030.  

&gt; v4.09 is unstable on my system, it simply will not run.

Then why not try 4.13 ?

ID: 6579 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote

Questions and Answers : Windows : Lost 200 hours of work after downgrade from 4.09 to 4.05

©2024 cpdn.org